* Stefano Lattarini wrote on Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 01:18:14AM CEST:
> At Friday 13 August 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> > * Stefano Lattarini wrote on Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 07:38:13PM CEST:
> > > At Friday 13 August 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> > > > Why are you not suggesting AM_MISSING_PROG([AUT
At Friday 13 August 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> * Stefano Lattarini wrote on Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 07:38:13PM CEST:
> > Hi Ralf. Sorry you missed my last "drop this" message...
>
> I didn't. I just hoped the post might be helpful anyway.
And it is. The "sorry" was addressed to you ("sorry if
* Stefano Lattarini wrote on Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 07:38:13PM CEST:
> Hi Ralf. Sorry you missed my last "drop this" message...
I didn't. I just hoped the post might be helpful anyway. Just ignore
it if it distracts you.
> At Friday 13 August 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> > Why are you not sugg
Hi Ralf. Sorry you missed my last "drop this" message...
At Friday 13 August 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> Hi Stefano,
>
> * Stefano Lattarini wrote on Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 07:00:08PM CEST:
> > Note that I have not yet run the whole testsuite on this change;
> > I will if you tell me you're int
Hi Stefano,
* Stefano Lattarini wrote on Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 07:00:08PM CEST:
> Note that I have not yet run the whole testsuite on this change; I will if
> you tell me you're interested in the patch.
I'm intrigued by the fact that there appears to be a bug in the current
implementation. I agre
Hmpf. No, the patch is still broken, and the tests are incomplete.
Please disregard it; I will post a new version later.
Thanks,
Stefano
