Re: [PATCH] Automake support for ObjC++

2009-11-25 Thread Peter Breitenlohner
On Tue, 15 Sep 2009, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: The other thing I'd like to see either in this patch or in a followup one is your play-1.1 test rewritten as an Automake testsuite addition, so that we have one full build test (including distcheck). (I can do that if you don't want to.) Hi Ralf, a

Re: [PATCH] Automake support for ObjC++

2009-11-24 Thread Peter Breitenlohner
On Tue, 15 Sep 2009, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: Would you be so nice as to respin and simplify the patch under the assumption that AC_PROG_OBJCXX exists? I think it should be sufficient to just require new enough Autoconf for this to work, that way we can avoid all the duplication and so on. This

Re: [PATCH] Automake support for ObjC++

2009-10-05 Thread Peter Breitenlohner
On Tue, 15 Sep 2009, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: Would you be so nice as to respin and simplify the patch under the assumption that AC_PROG_OBJCXX exists? I think it should be sufficient to just require new enough Autoconf for this to work, that way we can avoid all the duplication and so on. This

Re: [PATCH] Automake support for ObjC++

2009-09-16 Thread Peter Breitenlohner
On Wed, 16 Sep 2009, Peter Breitenlohner wrote: On Tue, 15 Sep 2009, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: ... Maybe it can even omit the objcxx.m4 file completely? Two more things: (1) Automake's choice of linker: With the ObjC++ patch the current choice is C only => CCLD ObjC (possibly plus C) => OBJ

Re: [PATCH] Automake support for ObjC++

2009-09-16 Thread Peter Breitenlohner
On Tue, 15 Sep 2009, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: This new version requires autoconf-2.64 (otherwise aclocal fails) and defines AM_PROG_OBJCXX. A hook for AC_PROG_OBJCXX, eventually to be defined by Autoconf, is already in place. Would you be so nice as to respin and simplify the patch under the as

Re: [PATCH] Automake support for ObjC++

2009-09-14 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hello Peter, and sorry for the delay. * Peter Breitenlohner wrote on Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 05:18:11PM CEST: > now that autoconf-2.64 is released, here a revised version of the patch I > sent you last week. Thanks. > This new version requires autoconf-2.64 (otherwise aclocal fails) and > defines A

Re: [PATCH] Automake support for ObjC++

2009-08-11 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hello Peter, * Peter Breitenlohner wrote on Wed, Aug 05, 2009 at 10:23:37AM CEST: > On Tue, 28 Jul 2009, Peter Breitenlohner wrote: > > >now that autoconf-2.64 is released, here a revised version of the patch I > >sent you last week. > > > >This new version requires autoconf-2.64 (otherwise acloc

Re: [PATCH] Automake support for ObjC++

2009-08-05 Thread Peter Breitenlohner
On Tue, 28 Jul 2009, Peter Breitenlohner wrote: now that autoconf-2.64 is released, here a revised version of the patch I sent you last week. This new version requires autoconf-2.64 (otherwise aclocal fails) and defines AM_PROG_OBJCXX. A hook for AC_PROG_OBJCXX, eventually to be defined by Aut

[SPAM] Re: [PATCH] Automake support for ObjC++

2009-07-28 Thread Peter Breitenlohner
On Thu, 23 Jul 2009, Peter Breitenlohner wrote: On Wed, 22 Jul 2009, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: Feel free to send it, if you have it anyway. More information can only help. ... here it is. .. Hi Ralf, now that autoconf-2.64 is released, here a revised version of the patch I sent you las