* Stefano Lattarini wrote on Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 08:33:55PM CEST:
> On Monday 13 September 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> >
> > I'm pushing this to maint.
> I see that, in fact, the pushed commit also contains a ChangeLog entry,
> while HACKING explicitly mandate not to be mentioned in ChangeLog
Since I see no reason forcing us to keep the HACKING file "invisible"
to the end user (not in ChangeLog, not in distributed tarball, ...),
I've gone ahead and written a very simple patch to mke it "visible".
OK for maint?
Regards,
Stefano
From 1ef59cdc330f2e863fcd4d9d2a6fb712826ffeb2 Mon Sep 17
Hi Ralf.
On Monday 13 September 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
>
> I'm pushing this to maint.
>
>
> * HACKING: Hint at old commits with `git describe' output.
>
> diff --git a/HACKING b/HACKING
> index d9b2099..ecbd0a8 100644
> --- a/HACKING
> +++ b/HACKING
> @@ -143,6 +143,8 @@
> the activ
