current status, in which even the most basic
>> patches, typofixes and bug reports get ignored.
>>
>>> Since my dayjob depends on Automake I could probably devote some
>>> small but fixed amount of time to Automake maintenance.
>>>
>>> Best re
get ignored.
Since my dayjob depends on Automake I could probably devote some
small but fixed amount of time to Automake maintenance.
Best regards.
Thank you for your interest and patience.
Cheers,
Stefano
Okay. So I'm wondering about two more things:
1) What implications does it
1. I'm no longer involved with GNU infrastructure work at all. (Write
maintain...@gnu.org to reach the people doing that stuff now, primarily
Brandon Invergo.) But I will comment anyway.
2. Jim (Meyering) is currently the only active maintainer of Automake.
Given that he is also responsible for
With great responsibility comes great power (pun intended ;-)
> On the other hand, any maintainer is better than no maintainer.
>
Absolutely! Even just having someone operating in maintenance mode
would be far better than the current status, in which even the most basic
patches, typofixes and bug reports get ignored.
> Since my dayjob depends on Automake I could probably devote some
> small but fixed amount of time to Automake maintenance.
>
> Best regards.
>
Thank you for your interest and patience.
Cheers,
Stefano
