Thank you, Karl!
On Sun, Jul 4, 2021 at 12:11 AM Karl Berry wrote:
> Hi madmurphy - regarding README.md et al, thanks for the patch. It
> avoided the warning, but didn't actually put the .md files in the
> distribution :). I finished the changes and committed them, so it will
> be in the next re
Hi madmurphy - regarding README.md et al, thanks for the patch. It
avoided the warning, but didn't actually put the .md files in the
distribution :). I finished the changes and committed them, so it will
be in the next release. Thanks again. -k
That is great! Please find the patch attached (use one of the two files in
the archive depending on whether you have already merged my previous patch
or not).
--madmurphy
On Thu, Jun 3, 2021 at 11:20 PM Karl Berry wrote:
> Sure, sounds logical to me to allow .md for all those top-level files.
>
Sure, sounds logical to me to allow .md for all those top-level files.
Any ChangeLog.md would have to be written in some strange way, but I
guess I see no harm in supporting it. -k
Thank you Karl and Jim! What would you think if send another patch for
extending the (optional) Markdown support to the INSTALL.md, ChangeLog.md
and NEWS.md files too (or any subset of these)?
Il giorno mar 1 giu 2021 alle ore 15:15 Jim Meyering ha
scritto:
> On Mon, May 31, 2021 at 4:53 PM Karl
On Mon, May 31, 2021 at 4:53 PM Karl Berry wrote:
> Markdown is a great invention and I believe time has come for GNU packages
> to support README.md files as optional alternatives to plain READMEs.
>
> Seems fine to me. (Jim?) Thanks. -k
The patch is fine. Thanks indeed.
Markdown is a great invention and I believe time has come for GNU packages
to support README.md files as optional alternatives to plain READMEs.
Seems fine to me. (Jim?) Thanks. -k
Markdown is a great invention and I believe time has come for GNU packages
to support README.md files as optional alternatives to plain READMEs.
Please find the patch attached.
--madmurphy
<>
