On 12/28/2011 09:19 PM, Stefano Lattarini wrote:
>
> I did some testing on Debian unstable, Solaris 10, NetBSD 5.1 and Cygwin 1.5
> (in
> part by running the relevant test cases from the automake testsuite, in part
> trying out the build system of GNU coreutils). Everything seems fine so far.
>
Hi Paul.
On 12/28/2011 09:08 PM, Paul Eggert wrote:
> On 12/26/11 13:35, Stefano Lattarini wrote:
>> testing on non-Linux systems (*BSD and Solaris at least, hopefully also
>> Cygwin or MinGW).
>
> I tested it on Solaris 8 and that test worked fine.
> I used Autoconf 2.63, GNU m4 1.4.13, and the
On 12/26/11 13:35, Stefano Lattarini wrote:
> testing on non-Linux systems (*BSD and Solaris at least, hopefully also
> Cygwin or MinGW).
I tested it on Solaris 8 and that test worked fine.
I used Autoconf 2.63, GNU m4 1.4.13, and the system-supplied 'make'.
Some of the other tests failed, e.g.,
On 12/26/2011 07:09 PM, Paul Eggert wrote:
> On 12/26/11 09:42, Stefano Lattarini wrote:
>> And here is the follow-up tweaking for the test cases I had
>> promised. I will push in a couple of days if there is no objection.
>
> Thanks, that looks good to me; please push it as soon as you like.
>
D
On 12/26/11 09:42, Stefano Lattarini wrote:
> And here is the follow-up tweaking for the test cases I had
> promised. I will push in a couple of days if there is no objection.
Thanks, that looks good to me; please push it as soon as you like.
tags 10237 + patch
tags 9928 + patch
thanks
On 12/25/2011 07:04 PM, Paul Eggert wrote:
> On 12/23/11 00:50, Stefano Lattarini wrote:
>> could you apply the patch *not to maint nor to master*, but to a *new*
>> branch (say `silent-fixes' or `silent-portability') based off of maint,
>> and push that
On 12/23/11 00:50, Stefano Lattarini wrote:
> could you apply the patch *not to maint nor to master*, but to a *new*
> branch (say `silent-fixes' or `silent-portability') based off of maint,
> and push that new branch to the public automake repo?
OK, done, as 'silent-fixes', with your recent nit-f
[adding automake-patches -- which I should have done before]
On 12/22/2011 10:56 PM, Paul Eggert wrote:
> On 12/21/11 04:21, Stefano Lattarini wrote:
>> Hi Paul, thanks for the respin. My comments and objections are inlined.
>
> Thanks, I have a patch updated with all those comments in mind.
> O
