On 06/28/2012 12:01 AM, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 06/26/2012 04:56 PM, Stefano Lattarini wrote:
>
AM_MISSING_PROG has been around for a while (git log says it was
introduced in 1997, although the current two-argument version appears to
date back to commit 9ae48df in Nov 1999), and seem
On 06/26/2012 04:56 PM, Stefano Lattarini wrote:
>>> AM_MISSING_PROG has been around for a while (git log says it was
>>> introduced in 1997, although the current two-argument version appears to
>>> date back to commit 9ae48df in Nov 1999), and seems like something
>>> stable enough to be worth gu
On 06/26/2012 09:07 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
> [adding bug-autoconf, for an autoconf documentation issue]
>
> On 06/26/2012 11:46 AM, Eric Blake wrote:
>> [adding bug-automake, to turn into a formal bug]
>>
>> On 06/26/2012 11:39 AM, Eric Blake wrote:
>>
>>> And while looking into how M4 differs from
tags 11793 + wishlist
thanks
> On 06/26/2012 11:39 AM, Eric Blake wrote:
>
>> And while looking into how M4 differs from coreutils, I noticed that
>> coreutils uses this via a .m4 file included into its configure.ac:
>>
>> AM_MISSING_PROG(HELP2MAN, help2man)
>>
>> which is roughly supposed to se
[adding bug-autoconf, for an autoconf documentation issue]
On 06/26/2012 11:46 AM, Eric Blake wrote:
> [adding bug-automake, to turn into a formal bug]
>
> On 06/26/2012 11:39 AM, Eric Blake wrote:
>
>> And while looking into how M4 differs from coreutils, I noticed that
>> coreutils uses this v
[adding bug-automake, to turn into a formal bug]
On 06/26/2012 11:39 AM, Eric Blake wrote:
> And while looking into how M4 differs from coreutils, I noticed that
> coreutils uses this via a .m4 file included into its configure.ac:
>
> AM_MISSING_PROG(HELP2MAN, help2man)
>
> which is roughly s
