Hi Akim,
* Akim Demaille wrote on Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 09:47:31AM CET:
> >>> "RW" == Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > hope I'm not going on your nerves yet .. ;-)
> Well, I'm the one who should plead guilty :( I apologize to be so not
> responsive.
Don't worry.
> > The only
>>> "RW" == Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi Akim,
> hope I'm not going on your nerves yet .. ;-)
Hi Ralf,
Well, I'm the one who should plead guilty :( I apologize to be so not
responsive.
>> >>> AM_DEFAULT_SOURCE_
* Ralf Wildenhues wrote on Sun, Nov 02, 2008 at 10:58:08PM CET:
> Choose default source extension: AM_DEFAULT_SOURCE_EXT.
>
> * automake.in (handle_source_transform): Accept unconditional
> literal extension in AM_DEFAULT_SOURCE_EXT as override for the
>
, Oct 16, 2008 at 04:11:22PM CEST:
> >>>
> >>> AM_DEFAULT_SOURCE_EXT = .cc
> > Hum, actually I meant to use extensions without the dot :(
>
> Erm, but you certainly didn't write it that way before! ;-)
>
> > Trying to find a distinctive meaning t
* Akim Demaille wrote on Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 12:56:23AM CEST:
> Le 18 oct. 08 à 03:02, Ralf Wildenhues a écrit :
>> * Akim Demaille wrote on Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 04:11:22PM CEST:
>>>
>>> I wish I could define
>>>
>>> AM_DEFAULT_SOURCE_EXT = .cc
&g
Le 18 oct. 08 à 03:02, Ralf Wildenhues a écrit :
* Akim Demaille wrote on Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 04:11:22PM CEST:
I wish I could define
AM_DEFAULT_SOURCE_EXT = .cc
or whatever, so that I wouldn't have to define all the foo_SOURCES.
I agree "extension" is better than &quo
* Akim Demaille wrote on Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 04:11:22PM CEST:
>
> I wish I could define
>
> AM_DEFAULT_SOURCE_EXT = .cc
>
> or whatever, so that I wouldn't have to define all the foo_SOURCES.
I agree "extension" is better than "suffix". (Even
