On 12/23/2011 11:17 AM, Stefano Lattarini wrote:
> HI Jim.
>
> On 12/23/2011 11:04 AM, Jim Meyering wrote:
>> Stefano Lattarini wrote:
>>> Any objection to the idea of finally merging the testsuite-work branch back
>>> into master?
>>
>> No objection at all. Please do.
>>
> I'll still wait a coup
On 12/23/2011 02:33 PM, Peter Rosin wrote:
> Stefano Lattarini skrev 2011-12-23 11:17:
>> HI Jim.
>>
>> On 12/23/2011 11:04 AM, Jim Meyering wrote:
>>> Stefano Lattarini wrote:
Any objection to the idea of finally merging the testsuite-work branch back
into master?
>>>
>>> No objection at
Stefano Lattarini skrev 2011-12-23 11:17:
> HI Jim.
>
> On 12/23/2011 11:04 AM, Jim Meyering wrote:
>> Stefano Lattarini wrote:
>>> Any objection to the idea of finally merging the testsuite-work branch back
>>> into master?
>>
>> No objection at all. Please do.
>>
> I'll still wait a couple of d
HI Jim.
On 12/23/2011 11:04 AM, Jim Meyering wrote:
> Stefano Lattarini wrote:
>> Any objection to the idea of finally merging the testsuite-work branch back
>> into master?
>
> No objection at all. Please do.
>
I'll still wait a couple of days to give Peter and Ralf a chance to chime in,
if the
Stefano Lattarini wrote:
> Any objection to the idea of finally merging the testsuite-work branch back
> into master?
No objection at all. Please do.
Hello automakers.
Any objection to the idea of finally merging the testsuite-work branch back
into master?
Keeping them separate is becoming quite artificial (in addition to causing
more work than is warranted), since there's no way we are going to release
a 1.12 version that doesn't include the
