On Thursday 19 August 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> * Stefano Lattarini wrote on Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 12:23:47PM CEST:
> [CUT]
> > In light of these considerations, is my wording acceptable?
> Yes, sure.
Good. I'll push shortly then.
> [CUT]
> Please complain if you feel I'm giving you too much
* Stefano Lattarini wrote on Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 12:23:47PM CEST:
> On Thursday 19 August 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> > Are you aware that merging fix-foo in maint, branch-1.11, and
> > master is equivalent to merging fix-foo in maint, then merging
> > maint in branch-1.11 and master (under the
On Thursday 19 August 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> * Stefano Lattarini wrote on Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 12:09:15AM CEST:
> > HACKING: improve description of git "bugfix branches".
> > HACKING: acknowledge Perl 4 as utterly obsolete.
>
> Nits below.
>
> > Subject: [PATCH 1/2] HACKING: improve d
* Stefano Lattarini wrote on Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 12:09:15AM CEST:
> HACKING: improve description of git "bugfix branches".
> HACKING: acknowledge Perl 4 as utterly obsolete.
Nits below.
> Subject: [PATCH 1/2] HACKING: improve description of git "bugfix branches".
>
> * HACKING (Working with
Stefano Lattarini (2):
HACKING: improve description of git "bugfix branches".
HACKING: acknowledge Perl 4 as utterly obsolete.
HACKING | 10 +-
1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
-*-*-
OK for maint?
Regards,
Stefano
From 9b1532f7d4ffea02157899c33b87289c277f454b Mo
