On 03/11/2013 01:05 PM, Bert Wesarg wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 10:46 AM, Stefano Lattarini
> wrote:
>> On 03/11/2013 10:31 AM, Bert Wesarg wrote:
>>> I have the impression that variable references in filenames aren't
>>> supported anyway, right?
>>>
>> Wrong, actually.
>
> But when I prefix
On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 10:46 AM, Stefano Lattarini
wrote:
> On 03/11/2013 10:31 AM, Bert Wesarg wrote:
>> I have the impression that variable references in filenames aren't
>> supported anyway, right?
>>
> Wrong, actually.
But when I prefixing a source file with '$(src)/' and use
subdir-objects
On 03/11/2013 10:31 AM, Bert Wesarg wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have one more question here:
>
> On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 1:39 PM, Stefano Lattarini
> wrote:
>> On 02/14/2013 01:20 PM, Bert Wesarg wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 11:26 AM, Stefano Lattarini wrote:
>>> What definitily will no
Hi,
I have one more question here:
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 1:39 PM, Stefano Lattarini
wrote:
> On 02/14/2013 01:20 PM, Bert Wesarg wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 11:26 AM, Stefano Lattarini wrote:
>> What definitily will not work ist something like this, right?
>>
>> here = %reldir%
On 02/14/2013 08:10 PM, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
> On Thu, 14 Feb 2013, Stefano Lattarini wrote:
>>
>>> A substantial blocker for converting large packages to non-recursive
>>> builds will be eliminated. Considerable time and electricity will
>>> be saved.
>>
>> By chance, do you plan to start using
On Thu, 14 Feb 2013, Stefano Lattarini wrote:
A substantial blocker for converting large packages to non-recursive
builds will be eliminated. Considerable time and electricity will
be saved.
By chance, do you plan to start using the feature in some package of
yours, even before it lands in a
On 02/14/2013 03:53 PM, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
> On Thu, 14 Feb 2013, Stefano Lattarini wrote:
>
>> From: Peter Rosin
>>
>> The rationale for this change is that it is annoying to have
>> to repeat the directory name when including a Makefile fragment.
>> For deep directory structures these repea
On Thu, 14 Feb 2013, Stefano Lattarini wrote:
From: Peter Rosin
The rationale for this change is that it is annoying to have
to repeat the directory name when including a Makefile fragment.
For deep directory structures these repeats can generate a lot
of bloat. It also hinders reuse and easy
On 02/14/2013 01:20 PM, Bert Wesarg wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 11:26 AM, Stefano Lattarini wrote:
>
>> diff --git a/NEWS b/NEWS
>> index 6dcce72..e27e0cf 100644
>> --- a/NEWS
>> +++ b/NEWS
>> @@ -100,6 +100,18 @@ New in 1.13.2:
>> be longer necessary, so we deprecate it with run
Hi,
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 11:26 AM, Stefano Lattarini
wrote:
> From: Peter Rosin
>
> The rationale for this change is that it is annoying to have
> to repeat the directory name when including a Makefile fragment.
> For deep directory structures these repeats can generate a lot
> of bloat. It
From: Peter Rosin
The rationale for this change is that it is annoying to have
to repeat the directory name when including a Makefile fragment.
For deep directory structures these repeats can generate a lot
of bloat. It also hinders reuse and easy directory restructuring
if all Makefile fragment
The rationale for this change is that it is annoying to have
to repeat the directory name when including a Makefile fragment.
For deep directory structures these repeats can generate a lot
of bloat. It also hinders reuse and easy directory restructuring
if all Makefile fragments have to know exact
12 matches
Mail list logo
