On Wed, Jan 8, 2020 at 2:03 PM Karl Berry wrote:
>
> how about this instead? (feels a little like removing a double negative):
> test "$EMACS" = t && EMACS=emacs
>
> Indeed, that looks a lot more natural, but as far as I can see, the
> problem is Automake's pervasive use of set -e.
>
> s
how about this instead? (feels a little like removing a double negative):
test "$EMACS" = t && EMACS=emacs
Indeed, that looks a lot more natural, but as far as I can see, the
problem is Automake's pervasive use of set -e.
sh-4.2$ test "$FOO" = t && FOO=foo
sh-4.2$ echo $?
1
Thus the te
On Tue, Jan 7, 2020 at 6:25 PM Karl Berry wrote:
> I belatedly noticed that I should have used skip_ instead of exit 77
> in my new too-old-Emacs test. Plus found a wrong occurrence of just
> "skip" without the _ in uninstall-fail.sh. Look ok?
Good catches both.
I noticed this added line:
test
I belatedly noticed that I should have used skip_ instead of exit 77
in my new too-old-Emacs test. Plus found a wrong occurrence of just
"skip" without the _ in uninstall-fail.sh. Look ok?
(uninstall-fail has more failures in the case of a newer File::Path, due
to changes in rmtree as used in delt
