On 03/06/2012 09:44 AM, Peter Rosin wrote:
>
> I made the changes and pushed, but it feels a bit hard to read -l${sp}foo
> compared to -lfoo, so I'm not too happy about it. Oh well...
>
Thanks.
Regards,
Stefano
Stefano Lattarini skrev 2012-03-05 21:00:
> On 03/05/2012 02:25 PM, Peter Rosin wrote:
>> Hi!
>>
>> I noticed that some expect the compiler to accept a space between
>> the option letter and the option argument. Looking at POSIX, this
>> seems like an acceptable expectation, if not even preferred.
On 03/05/2012 02:25 PM, Peter Rosin wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I noticed that some expect the compiler to accept a space between
> the option letter and the option argument. Looking at POSIX, this
> seems like an acceptable expectation, if not even preferred. So,
> here's an update for the compile script w
POSIX mandates that the compiler accepts a space between the -I,
-l and -L options and their respective arguments.
* lib/compile (func_cl_dashl): New function with factored out code
for implementing the -l option for the cl wrapper.
(func_cl_dashL): New function with factored out code implementing
