Another couple of copyright-related fixlets. I've applied the first
one to maint, the second one to master.
Regards,
Stefano
>From db5ddc2bfceeb4470d02c2ff2375cf5900415493 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
Message-Id:
From: Stefano Lattarini
Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2012 10:33:30 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] updat
On 02/14/2012 09:55 PM, Jim Meyering wrote:
>
> Subject: [PATCH] maint: add a rule to use gnulib's update-copyright
>
> * lib/update-copyright: New file, from gnulib.
> * Makefile.am (FETCHFILES): Add update-copyright to the list.
> (fetch): Fetch it.
> (u
Stefano Lattarini wrote:
...
>> I propose to push the result of doing this:
>>
>> $ git ci -m 'maint: run "make update-copyright"' -a
>> [maint aafc6b5] maint: run "make update-copyright"
>>1041 files changed, 1041 insertions(+), 1266 deletions(-)
>>
> Hmm... It now occurs to me that, if w
:00:00 2001
>>> From: Jim Meyering
>>> Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2012 16:57:42 +0100
>>> Subject: [PATCH] maint: add a rule to use gnulib's update-copyright
>>>
>>> * lib/update-copyright: New file, from gnulib.
>>> * Makefile.am (FETCHFI
Stefano Lattarini wrote:
> Hi Jim.
>
> On 02/12/2012 06:57 PM, Jim Meyering wrote:
>>
>> Here's the adjusted c-set:
>>
>> From 21b627dbec3347c2befde186c65592b9f177cd8d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>> From: Jim Meyering
>> Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2012 16:57
Hi Jim.
On 02/12/2012 06:57 PM, Jim Meyering wrote:
>
> Here's the adjusted c-set:
>
> From 21b627dbec3347c2befde186c65592b9f177cd8d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Jim Meyering
> Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2012 16:57:42 +0100
> Subject: [PATCH] maint: add a rule to use
a separate issue. )
>>>
>> Agreed. What would you propose to address that? (I'm assuming you'll agree
>> with me that having gnulib as an automake git submodule would be a *gross*
>> overkill).
>
> Perhaps (some day) a submodule with the bits fro
overkill).
Perhaps (some day) a submodule with the bits from gnulib's build-aux/ and
top/ directories. But that might mean moving them from gnulib proper to
a submodule of gnulib. I don't want to go there right now ;-)
>> From fd93630e5c6aa9a9775ae945787b9903bab2f6c6 Mon Sep 1
;
I agree it's a good idea to keep this change separate.
> Here's the first patch:
> (I don't particularly like to copy update-copyright from gnulib and
> VC it here in automake, but that's the current method. Addressing that,
> if desired, would be a separate issue. )
