Hi Paolo,
Thanks for your work on this, and apologies for the delay.
* Paolo Bonzini wrote on Mon, Mar 12, 2007 at 06:36:33PM CET:
> Ok, here's the patch I sent a month ago together with new
> testcases.
Hmm. Normal TEXINFOS are distributed by default (even their .info files
are). It strikes m
PING... (or just give me commit access so I can do it myself).
http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.sysutils.automake.patches/2731
Paolo
Ok, here's the patch I sent a month ago together with new
testcases.
I also found a little opportunity for refactoring.
Paolo
2007-03-12 Paolo Bonzini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* automake.in (output_texinfo_build_rules): Add COND parameter.
Emit INFO_DEPS and TEXINFOS.
(hand
Ok for mainline *and* branch 1.9
since GCC is not quite ready to jump to autoconf 2.60?
Is it easy to describe or see what's missing for GCC to do the move?
Now it's ready; the missing part was that it was easier to first migrate
the toplevel to 2.59, and then move everything to 2.60.
I'l
Hello Paolo,
Thanks for your patch, and apologies for the delay.
* Paolo Bonzini wrote on Tue, Jan 30, 2007 at 12:41:57PM CET:
The attached patch allows one to have conditional info_TEXINFOS values.
This is required by GCC (see http://gcc.gnu.org/PR30546 for info).
The change needs a NEWS
The attached patch allows one to have conditional info_TEXINFOS values.
This is required by GCC (see http://gcc.gnu.org/PR30546 for info).
I checked that the patch does not have any change on the automake
makefiles themselves, besides passing the testsuite with a new test.
Ok for mainline *a
