On 04/12/2012 07:00 PM, Jim Meyering wrote:
>
> Thanks for the speedy review.
> "make distcheck" is running now.
>
Feel free to push once that passes.
Thanks again for tackling this,
Stefano
Stefano Lattarini wrote:
...
>> a subsequent "make -j3" would create the missing file.
>> That was because help2man would invoke t/wrap/aclocal.in and
>> t/wrap/automake.in, each of which would require aclocal and
>> automake, yet those two files weren't guaranteed to be created.
>> Add explicit de
Hi Jim, thanks for the patches.
On 04/12/2012 06:11 PM, Jim Meyering wrote:
>
>>> IMHO, there is only one way to work around this: don't distribute
>>> those two files, i.e., generate them at build time.
>>> That means either automake distributes the help2man script
>>> (as coreutils does) or it a
t;>> build -- how foolish. Do you think this issue warrants another beta
>>> release?
>>>
>>>> I tracked them down:
>>>>
>>>> From 3fcf1fe611140eb6677d5893719bec1d96f106db Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>>>> From: Jim Meyering
>&
ants another beta
>> release?
>>
>>> I tracked them down:
>>>
>>> From 3fcf1fe611140eb6677d5893719bec1d96f106db Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>>> From: Jim Meyering
>>> Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2012 21:25:48 +0200
>>> Subject: [PATCH] avoid parallel build
1140eb6677d5893719bec1d96f106db Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>> From: Jim Meyering
>> Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2012 21:25:48 +0200
>> Subject: [PATCH] avoid parallel build failures
>>
> Minor tiny nit (feel free to ignore it): could you prepend the summary
> line with either "
t; Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2012 21:25:48 +0200
> Subject: [PATCH] avoid parallel build failures
>
Minor tiny nit (feel free to ignore it): could you prepend the summary
line with either "build:" or "fixup:", so that the guidelines in HACKING
are followed?
> A parallel build
Surprised by parallel build failures, I tracked them down:
>From 3fcf1fe611140eb6677d5893719bec1d96f106db Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jim Meyering
Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2012 21:25:48 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] avoid parallel build failures
A parallel build would fail when two concurrent sub-m
