[re-adding the list]
On 03/06/2012 09:18 PM, Peter Rosin wrote:
>>
>> You also forgot scriptversion...
>
True, but see below.
> ...which is the reason this change should have been committed on msvc.
> Updating compile/depcomp/ar-lib on maint destroys the rule saying
> "newer is better".
>
But th
On 03/06/2012 07:47 PM, Michael wrote:
>
> My full name is: Michael Hofmann
>
Thanks. I've now pushed the attached patch in your name.
I will try to take a look soonish at the failures you've reported.
Thanks,
Stefano
>From 00ff60772869d54918d6d8a055110d61bad86220 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
Mes
On 03/05/2012 05:52 PM, Michael wrote:
> Hi Stefano,
>
> Am 03.03.2012 19:53, schrieb Stefano Lattarini:
>> The patch looks good, is unobtrusive, and is small enough to be applied
>> without requiring you to sign any copyright paper (yay!). Before applying
>> it, though, I'd like to know if you h
On 03/03/2012 03:23 PM, Michael wrote:
> Hi,
>
Hi Michael, thanks for the patch.
> I was recently working with an IBM system using the IBM XL C/C++
> compiler and the dependency tracking did not work (style "none").
> Enclosed is a patch for depcomp to use the gcc-like generation of
> dependency f
Hi,
I was recently working with an IBM system using the IBM XL C/C++
compiler and the dependency tracking did not work (style "none").
Enclosed is a patch for depcomp to use the gcc-like generation of
dependency files of recent IBM compilers.
Best regards,
Michael
--- build-aux/depcomp.orig 2012
