Re: [PATCH] {master} missing: better tips about missing tools

2012-06-25 Thread Stefano Lattarini
On 06/23/2012 01:58 PM, Stefano Lattarini wrote: > On 06/23/2012 10:39 AM, Dave Hart wrote: >> >> Looks like a nice improvement, thanks. >> > Glad you like it. I will push by tomorrow if there is > no further feedback. > I've pushed the patch, applied the follow-up below on the top of it, merged

Re: [PATCH] {master} missing: better tips about missing tools

2012-06-23 Thread Stefano Lattarini
On 06/23/2012 10:39 AM, Dave Hart wrote: > > Looks like a nice improvement, thanks. > Glad you like it. I will push by tomorrow if there is no further feedback. Thanks, Stefano

Re: [PATCH] {master} missing: better tips about missing tools

2012-06-23 Thread Dave Hart
On Sat, Jun 23, 2012 at 07:17 UTC, Stefano Lattarini wrote: > * lib/missing: Try to point the user to the home page of such tools > where possible.  Also, make clear that some tools (e.g., aclocal or > autoheader) are distributed as part of bigger projects (resp. automake > and autoconf, in those c

[PATCH] {master} missing: better tips about missing tools

2012-06-23 Thread Stefano Lattarini
* lib/missing: Try to point the user to the home page of such tools where possible. Also, make clear that some tools (e.g., aclocal or autoheader) are distributed as part of bigger projects (resp. automake and autoconf, in those cases). While at it, refactor and re-format the existing code heavil