Re: [PATCH] {maint} test defs: new requirement for the default java compiler

2011-04-10 Thread Stefano Lattarini
On Sunday 10 April 2011, Stefano Lattarini wrote: > On Sunday 10 April 2011, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > > * Stefano Lattarini wrote on Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 10:23:11AM CEST: > > > On Sunday 10 April 2011, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > > > > Hmm. Did you test this though? > > > > > > > Yes, but I only have

Re: [PATCH] {maint} test defs: new requirement for the default java compiler

2011-04-10 Thread Stefano Lattarini
On Sunday 10 April 2011, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > * Stefano Lattarini wrote on Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 10:23:11AM CEST: > > On Sunday 10 April 2011, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > > > Hmm. Did you test this though? > > > > > Yes, but I only have javac 1.6.0 on my system, which works even with > > just the

Re: [PATCH] {maint} test defs: new requirement for the default java compiler

2011-04-10 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
* Stefano Lattarini wrote on Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 10:23:11AM CEST: > On Sunday 10 April 2011, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > > Hmm. Did you test this though? > > > Yes, but I only have javac 1.6.0 on my system, which works even with > just the `-version' option: Oh, ok. > Maybe adding also the `-help'

Re: [PATCH] {maint} test defs: new requirement for the default java compiler

2011-04-10 Thread Stefano Lattarini
On Sunday 10 April 2011, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > * Stefano Lattarini wrote on Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 09:50:14AM CEST: > > Thanks for the fast review, > >Stefano > > Hmm. Did you test this though? > Yes, but I only have javac 1.6.0 on my system, which works even with just the `-version' option:

Re: [PATCH] {maint} test defs: new requirement for the default java compiler

2011-04-10 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
* Stefano Lattarini wrote on Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 09:50:14AM CEST: > Thanks for the fast review, >Stefano Hmm. Did you test this though? The tests are all skipping for me now now, but I have javac installed: SKIP: instdir-java.test (exit: 77) == /tmp/build/t

Re: [PATCH] {maint} test defs: new requirement for the default java compiler

2011-04-10 Thread Stefano Lattarini
On Sunday 10 April 2011, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > * Stefano Lattarini wrote on Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 09:11:07AM CEST: > > IMHO having a proper requirement for the java compiler in `tests/defs' > > would be better than the current behaviour running the check for the > > availability of javac in the g

Re: [PATCH] {maint} test defs: new requirement for the default java compiler

2011-04-10 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
* Stefano Lattarini wrote on Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 09:11:07AM CEST: > IMHO having a proper requirement for the java compiler in `tests/defs' > would be better than the current behaviour running the check for the > availability of javac in the generated configure script in each > relevant test. And

[PATCH] {maint} test defs: new requirement for the default java compiler

2011-04-10 Thread Stefano Lattarini
Hello automakers. IMHO having a proper requirement for the java compiler in `tests/defs' would be better than the current behaviour running the check for the availability of javac in the generated configure script in each relevant test. And it would also be faster for systems that lack a java co