Re: [FYI] {yl-work-for-master} fixup: remove double news entry

2012-02-14 Thread Stefano Lattarini
On 02/13/2012 06:51 PM, Eric Blake wrote: > On 02/13/2012 10:45 AM, Stefano Lattarini wrote: >> On 02/13/2012 04:47 PM, Peter Rosin wrote: >>> >>> I have pushed the following as obvious: >>> >>> From: Peter Rosin >>> Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2012 16:43:34 +0100 >>> Subject: [PATCH] fixup: remove double n

Re: [FYI] {yl-work-for-master} fixup: remove double news entry

2012-02-13 Thread Eric Blake
On 02/13/2012 10:45 AM, Stefano Lattarini wrote: > On 02/13/2012 04:47 PM, Peter Rosin wrote: >> >> I have pushed the following as obvious: >> >> From: Peter Rosin >> Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2012 16:43:34 +0100 >> Subject: [PATCH] fixup: remove double news entry >> >> * NEWS: Remove double (stale) news

Re: [FYI] {yl-work-for-master} fixup: remove double news entry

2012-02-13 Thread Stefano Lattarini
On 02/13/2012 04:47 PM, Peter Rosin wrote: > > I have pushed the following as obvious: > > From: Peter Rosin > Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2012 16:43:34 +0100 > Subject: [PATCH] fixup: remove double news entry > > * NEWS: Remove double (stale) news entry introduced by a botched > merge. > Thanks. And I t

[FYI] {yl-work-for-master} fixup: remove double news entry

2012-02-13 Thread Peter Rosin
Peter Rosin skrev 2012-02-13 16:44: > Oh, I also noticed that the merge into yl-work-for-master is bad with regard > to NEWS, as it still contains the old entry w/o lex (which appears to be the > origin of the confusing wording): > > - C source and header files derived from non-distributed Yacc