Re: [FYI] {parallel-tests-maint} docs: parallel-tests is not experimental anymore

2011-06-27 Thread Stefano Lattarini
On Monday 27 June 2011, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > * Stefano Lattarini wrote on Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 03:48:58PM CEST: > > I now think that the parallel-tests-maint should be merged > > to maint. Objections? > > OK. > > Thanks, > Ralf > Merged and pushed. Thanks, Stefano

Re: [FYI] {parallel-tests-maint} docs: parallel-tests is not experimental anymore

2011-06-27 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
* Stefano Lattarini wrote on Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 03:48:58PM CEST: > On Monday 27 June 2011, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > > * Stefano Lattarini wrote on Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 09:32:53AM CEST: > > > Subject: [PATCH] Revert "docs: parallel-tests is not experimental anymore" > > > > > > This reverts commi

Re: [FYI] {parallel-tests-maint} docs: parallel-tests is not experimental anymore

2011-06-27 Thread Stefano Lattarini
On Monday 27 June 2011, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > * Stefano Lattarini wrote on Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 09:32:53AM CEST: > > Subject: [PATCH] Revert "docs: parallel-tests is not experimental anymore" > > > > This reverts commit a9eef973b5ea47cc3495f1a8307d4f7b85aea46f. > > > > It turned out that the c

Re: [FYI] {parallel-tests-maint} docs: parallel-tests is not experimental anymore

2011-06-26 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
* Stefano Lattarini wrote on Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 09:32:53AM CEST: > Subject: [PATCH] Revert "docs: parallel-tests is not experimental anymore" > > This reverts commit a9eef973b5ea47cc3495f1a8307d4f7b85aea46f. > > It turned out that the current work to introduce TAP and SubUnit > support in Autom

Re: [FYI] {parallel-tests-maint} docs: parallel-tests is not experimental anymore

2011-06-24 Thread Stefano Lattarini
Reference to original thread: On Sunday 15 May 2011, Stefano Lattarini wrote: > On Sunday 15 May 2011, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > > * Stefano Lattarini wrote on Sun, May 15, 2011 at 04:10:29PM CEST: > > > On Sunday 15 May 20

Re: [FYI] {parallel-tests-maint} docs: parallel-tests is not experimental anymore

2011-05-15 Thread Stefano Lattarini
On Sunday 15 May 2011, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > * Stefano Lattarini wrote on Sun, May 15, 2011 at 04:10:29PM CEST: > > On Sunday 15 May 2011, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > > > Well, the point of declaring it experimental is being able to do at > > > least slightly incompatible changes and mostly getting

Re: [FYI] {parallel-tests-maint} docs: parallel-tests is not experimental anymore

2011-05-15 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
* Stefano Lattarini wrote on Sun, May 15, 2011 at 04:10:29PM CEST: > On Sunday 15 May 2011, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > > Well, the point of declaring it experimental is being able to do at > > least slightly incompatible changes and mostly getting away with it. > > > > The changes might not just be n

Re: [FYI] {parallel-tests-maint} docs: parallel-tests is not experimental anymore

2011-05-15 Thread Stefano Lattarini
On Sunday 15 May 2011, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > Hi Stefano, > > * Stefano Lattarini wrote on Wed, May 11, 2011 at 04:07:46PM CEST: > > The parallel-tests driver has now been used quite extensively > > by a fair number of real-world applications (e.g., GNU coreutils, > > GNU libtool, GNU grep, and

Re: [FYI] {parallel-tests-maint} docs: parallel-tests is not experimental anymore

2011-05-15 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hi Stefano, * Stefano Lattarini wrote on Wed, May 11, 2011 at 04:07:46PM CEST: > The parallel-tests driver has now been used quite extensively > by a fair number of real-world applications (e.g., GNU coreutils, > GNU libtool, GNU grep, and various packages using Gnulib), and > thus exposed to adeq

[FYI] {parallel-tests-maint} docs: parallel-tests is not experimental anymore

2011-05-11 Thread Stefano Lattarini
The parallel-tests driver has now been used quite extensively by a fair number of real-world applications (e.g., GNU coreutils, GNU libtool, GNU grep, and various packages using Gnulib), and thus exposed to adequate on-field testing. So there's no point in declaring it experimental anymore (which