* Stefano Lattarini wrote on Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 08:24:13AM CEST:
> On Monday 27 June 2011, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> > Sure. Well, do they use some format already?
> >
> Well, there are only two of them, and both follows this format:
>
> @c The test case for the setup described here is
> @c
On Monday 27 June 2011, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> * Stefano Lattarini wrote on Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 03:35:23PM CEST:
> > On Monday 27 June 2011, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> > > > +@c The following example should be covered by the test case
> > > > +@c 'autodist-config-headers.test'.
> > >
> > > @c The
* Stefano Lattarini wrote on Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 03:35:23PM CEST:
> On Monday 27 June 2011, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> > > +@c The following example should be covered by the test case
> > > +@c 'autodist-config-headers.test'.
> >
> > @c The following example is covered by autodist-config-headers.te
On Monday 27 June 2011, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> * Stefano Lattarini wrote on Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 11:33:41PM CEST:
> > On Thursday 23 June 2011, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> > > Footnotes are hard to read and distract the flow, esp. in an info file.
> > >
> > Sorry, I never use info(1) directly (never
* Stefano Lattarini wrote on Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 11:33:41PM CEST:
> On Thursday 23 June 2011, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> > Footnotes are hard to read and distract the flow, esp. in an info file.
> >
> Sorry, I never use info(1) directly (never bothered to learn it actually);
Actually, I had been re
On Thursday 23 June 2011, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> [ from automake-commit ]
>
> since I didn't review the source patch yet:
>
> * Stefano Lattarini wrote on Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 11:03:52AM CEST:
> > --- a/doc/automake.texi
> > +++ b/doc/automake.texi
> > @@ -8293,7 +8293,9 @@ as are all @file{Mak
[ from automake-commit ]
since I didn't review the source patch yet:
* Stefano Lattarini wrote on Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 11:03:52AM CEST:
> --- a/doc/automake.texi
> +++ b/doc/automake.texi
> @@ -8293,7 +8293,9 @@ as are all @file{Makefile.am}s and @file{Makefile.in}s.
> Automake also
> has a bu