Re: [PATCH] docs: avoid a footnote, some related rewordings and improvements (was: Re: [Automake-commit] [SCM] GNU Automake branch, maint, updated. v1.11-393-gc1040a7)

2011-06-28 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
* Stefano Lattarini wrote on Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 08:24:13AM CEST: > On Monday 27 June 2011, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > > Sure. Well, do they use some format already? > > > Well, there are only two of them, and both follows this format: > > @c The test case for the setup described here is > @c

Re: [PATCH] docs: avoid a footnote, some related rewordings and improvements (was: Re: [Automake-commit] [SCM] GNU Automake branch, maint, updated. v1.11-393-gc1040a7)

2011-06-27 Thread Stefano Lattarini
On Monday 27 June 2011, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > * Stefano Lattarini wrote on Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 03:35:23PM CEST: > > On Monday 27 June 2011, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > > > > +@c The following example should be covered by the test case > > > > +@c 'autodist-config-headers.test'. > > > > > > @c The

Re: [PATCH] docs: avoid a footnote, some related rewordings and improvements (was: Re: [Automake-commit] [SCM] GNU Automake branch, maint, updated. v1.11-393-gc1040a7)

2011-06-27 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
* Stefano Lattarini wrote on Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 03:35:23PM CEST: > On Monday 27 June 2011, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > > > +@c The following example should be covered by the test case > > > +@c 'autodist-config-headers.test'. > > > > @c The following example is covered by autodist-config-headers.te

Re: [PATCH] docs: avoid a footnote, some related rewordings and improvements (was: Re: [Automake-commit] [SCM] GNU Automake branch, maint, updated. v1.11-393-gc1040a7)

2011-06-27 Thread Stefano Lattarini
On Monday 27 June 2011, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > * Stefano Lattarini wrote on Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 11:33:41PM CEST: > > On Thursday 23 June 2011, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > > > Footnotes are hard to read and distract the flow, esp. in an info file. > > > > > Sorry, I never use info(1) directly (never

Re: [PATCH] docs: avoid a footnote, some related rewordings and improvements (was: Re: [Automake-commit] [SCM] GNU Automake branch, maint, updated. v1.11-393-gc1040a7)

2011-06-26 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
* Stefano Lattarini wrote on Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 11:33:41PM CEST: > On Thursday 23 June 2011, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > > Footnotes are hard to read and distract the flow, esp. in an info file. > > > Sorry, I never use info(1) directly (never bothered to learn it actually); Actually, I had been re

[PATCH] docs: avoid a footnote, some related rewordings and improvements (was: Re: [Automake-commit] [SCM] GNU Automake branch, maint, updated. v1.11-393-gc1040a7)

2011-06-23 Thread Stefano Lattarini
On Thursday 23 June 2011, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > [ from automake-commit ] > > since I didn't review the source patch yet: > > * Stefano Lattarini wrote on Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 11:03:52AM CEST: > > --- a/doc/automake.texi > > +++ b/doc/automake.texi > > @@ -8293,7 +8293,9 @@ as are all @file{Mak

Re: [Automake-commit] [SCM] GNU Automake branch, maint, updated. v1.11-393-gc1040a7

2011-06-23 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
[ from automake-commit ] since I didn't review the source patch yet: * Stefano Lattarini wrote on Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 11:03:52AM CEST: > --- a/doc/automake.texi > +++ b/doc/automake.texi > @@ -8293,7 +8293,9 @@ as are all @file{Makefile.am}s and @file{Makefile.in}s. > Automake also > has a bu