Re: proposed patch to support Unified Parallel C (version 3 of patch)

2006-08-14 Thread Jonathan Higa
y case for Autoconfiscation stronger. -- Jonathan HIGA

Re: proposed patch to support Unified Parallel C (version 3 of patch)

2006-08-05 Thread Jonathan Higa
On 8/4/06, Alexandre Duret-Lutz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Congratulations on the patch, and thanks for making it complete. It looks great, but I can see a couple of minor problems. My main complaint is that your tests do not show that building a upc program actually work. Here is a Version

proposed patch to support Unified Parallel C (version 3 of patch)

2006-08-01 Thread Jonathan Higa
to support Unified Parallel C in Automake. The changes are mostly derived from the support for Objective C. * A ChangeLog entry as plaintext; see the various ChangeLog files for format and content. 2006-08-02 Jonathan Higa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * NEWS: Announce new support for Un

Re: attempted patch to support Unified Parallel C

2006-07-05 Thread Jonathan Higa
On 7/4/06, Jonathan Higa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I'm trying to add support for Unified Parallel C. Source files have the suffix .upc. Typical compilers are called upcc or upc. A patch file (automake-upc.patch) and a tarball containing a new M4 macro and two test cases (a

attempted patch to support Unified Parallel C

2006-07-04 Thread Jonathan Higa
ocal -I m4 /bin/sh: /home/jon/Download/automake/aclocal: No such file or directory What do I need to do to create this 'aclocal' file properly? ChangeLog entry as plaintext: 2006-07-04 Jonathan Higa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * automake.in ('name' => 'objc'