Eric wrote:
> The autoconf manual still recommends:
>
> Do not use @samp{test -x}, because 4.3BSD does not
> have it.
>
> Is this still an issue? Or should we be updating the autoconf manual?
I remember this biting me within the last ~4 years' time.
I don't know if it's still an issue or not,
Stefano wrote:
> Partecipants to the Google Summer of Code are required to stop working
> on their projects at August 22 19:00 UTC, ...
I don't believe that is correct. Students are free to keep working on
their projects for as long as they want - it's just that for purposes of
the GSoC student
Eric,
Sounds good - thanks very much!
H
This is the first I've seen on this thread.
I have heard that GPLv3 is viral/invasive.
The short question I have is:
If automake/autoconf use GPLv3, will I be able to use them for packages
that are NOT GPLv3?
IE, if GPLv3 is viral/invasive, I cannot use software covered by GPLv3
for most of t
What about PATH issues and '.'? It may not be a problem, but the
thought leapt into my mind...
H
--
> Following these lines, it's nonsense to maintain some
> half-support for non-executable install-sh. If we don't want to
> support this use-case, ${SHELL} should be fully removed from
> every cal
