[bug#59989] [PATCH] tests: Fix txinfo-include test for texinfo 7.x

2022-12-14 Thread Gavin Smith
On Mon, Dec 12, 2022 at 07:28:38AM +0100, Frederic Berat wrote: > From: Frédéric Bérat > > Texinfo modified its behavior regarding apostrophes, which are now > replaced by UTF-8 right single quotes by default. > It looks like this was supposed to be the default for few years already, > but this b

Re: preparing for a new release

2020-11-15 Thread Gavin Smith
On Sun, Nov 15, 2020 at 09:45:44AM -0800, Jim Meyering wrote: > I've fixed a few of these failures, but here is still at least one > that I have not fixed: t/txinfo-no-clutter. In this case, running it > with no parallelism and by itself passes: > make -k check TESTS='t/txinfo-no-clutter' > Yet r

Re: preparing for a new release

2020-11-15 Thread Gavin Smith
On Sun, Nov 15, 2020 at 09:45:44AM -0800, Jim Meyering wrote: > Karl has made quite a few improvements, so I'm preparing to make a new > release. But first, I wanted to make the tests pass reliably also when > running them in parallel (the only way I run them, because otherwise, > they take way too

Re: bug#34201: [PATCH] automake: do not require @setfilename in Texinfo files

2019-09-14 Thread Gavin Smith
On Mon, Sep 2, 2019 at 6:28 PM Jim Meyering wrote: > > Gavin Smith proposed a patch for this back in http://bugs.gnu.org/34201 > Another reference to the problem: http://bugs.gnu.org/36921 > > In the attached (in Gavin's name), I've added a NEWS entry and > adjusted th

Re: [RFC] improving support for building native tools in cross setups

2014-01-30 Thread Gavin Smith
On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 10:40 PM, Yann Dirson wrote: > Hello, > > It is not uncommon for software packages to build tools to be executed > at build time, to generate data files or more input files to compile. > > Unless I miss something, the current autotools does not help much > dealing with this

Re: [FYI] {branch-1.13.2} HACKING: miscellaneous fixes, updates and enhancements

2013-05-15 Thread Gavin Smith
> - We used to use '_am_' as the prefix for an internal AC_SUBST. > + We used to use '_am_' as the prefix for an internal AC_SUBSTs. This looks like a typo - should the "s" be there? On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 8:20 PM, Stefano Lattarini wrote: > Signed-off-by: Stefano Lattarini > --- > HACKING

Re: Add missing '$' for variable expansion in depout.m4

2013-04-11 Thread Gavin Smith
em to communicate (although an unusual way of doing it would be for automake to generate files which are source'd or m4_include'd from configure.ac). On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 7:45 PM, Nick Bowler wrote: > On 2013-04-11 19:12 +0100, Gavin Smith wrote: >> (I hope I have prepared th

Add missing '$' for variable expansion in depout.m4

2013-04-11 Thread Gavin Smith
(I hope I have prepared this patch properly.) Add missing '$' for variable expansion in depout.m4 * m4/depout.m4: "am__include" appeared where "$am__include" was meant. diff --git a/m4/depout.m4 b/m4/depout.m4 index 880a597..c79d04b 100644 --- a/m4/depout.m4 +++ b/m4/depout.m4 @@ -40,7 +