Re: Autogen 5.9.4 licensing

2008-01-28 Thread Bruce Korb
Hi Deborah, Ralf, On Jan 28, 2008 1:03 PM, Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Are you speaking about Autogen or Autoconf? Autogen and auto_MAKE_. Yes, both, I think. > The latest Automake release, 1.10.1, installs a GPLv3 COPYING file into > a project, when > automake --add-missing

Re: Autogen 5.9.4 licensing

2008-01-28 Thread Bruce Korb
On Jan 28, 2008 12:37 PM, Deborah Nicholson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > This is Deborah and I maintain the Free Software Directory. I was just > adding the newest version of Autoconf. As part of that process, I always > look at the licenses. > > The latest version of Autoconf comes with GPLv

Re: Automake and GPLv3

2007-08-30 Thread Bruce Korb
On 8/29/07, Eric Blake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > > The short question I have is: > > > > If automake/autoconf use GPLv3, will I be able to use them for packages > > that are NOT GPLv3? > > The goal is YES. Remember, with autoconf 2.61 and automake 1.10, bo

Re: ensure that generated files are read-only

2006-09-10 Thread Bruce Korb
Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > [ adding automake-patches ] > > * Simon Josefsson wrote on Thu, Sep 07, 2006 at 04:56:02PM CEST: > >>Bruce Korb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >>>Ralf Wildenhues wrote: >>> >>> >>>>The fix is to >