Re: [PATCH] Use the first form of test command

Hey Karl, thank you for your quick response! I did what you’ve asked. https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/config-patches/2020-08/msg2.html Cheers! > On 08/17/2020 12:47 AM Karl Berry wrote: > > > Hi Issam, > > --- a/lib/config.guess > +++ b/lib/config.guess > ... > - if [ "

Re: [PATCH] Use the first form of test command

Hi Issam, --- a/lib/config.guess +++ b/lib/config.guess ... - if [ "$CC_FOR_BUILD" != no_compiler_found ]; then + if test "$CC_FOR_BUILD" != no_compiler_found; then I agree, and also it's common practice in the basic utility scripts to use test, but this patch needs to go

[PATCH] Use the first form of test command

The first form is easier to implement and directly available in BusyBox. https://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/utilities/test.html This change has also been done in make and cmake. https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/make.git/commit/?id=c8a6263 https://gitlab.kitware.com/cmake/cmake/-/mer