They are likely not general enough for widespread use, but they
are useful nonetheless.
In the best-case scenario, they will start to be used by other
people, and thus accordingly improved and made more general and
flexible.
In the worst case scenario, well, I still get to keep them in a
centrali
Stefano Lattarini writes:
> So I ask: do you think it would be worthwhile to curb the quantity
> of patches posted here, by posting only the patches judged worth
> of "general interest"? Or, if that sounds overly "harsh", what
> should I/we do to ensure important changes have more visibility?
I
Hello automakers.
In a private mail recently, it has been pointed out to me that the
amount of patches posted on the automake-list make it difficult to
spot the user-relevant and/or possibly controversial patches among
the huge crowd of typofixes, trivial changes, minor refactorings,
or testsuite
commit 97d770d69c3522beab5aec18d135d84b3b5eb449
Merge: db64467 fe05207
Author: Stefano Lattarini
Date: Wed Jan 2 14:45:42 2013 +0100
Merge branch 'maint'
* maint:
tests: reorganize tests on backslash issues
style: add trailing ':' to some test cases
tests: tweak tests
* t/backsl.sh, t/backsl2.sh, t/backsl3.sh: Merge ...
* t/backslash-issues.sh: ... into this test.
* t/backsl4.sh: Rename ...
* t/backslash-before-trailing-whitespace.sh: ... like this.
* t/list-of-tests.mk: Adjust.
Signed-off-by: Stefano Lattarini
---
t/backsl.sh
And here is the patch deprecating the "CLEANFILES hack". This too is
for maint, and scheduled to appear in Automake 1.13.2. I will push
it with together with the patch introducing the new 'info-in-builddir'
option, tomorrow.
Regards,
Stefano
8< 8< 8< 8< 8< 8< ---
