Stefano Lattarini writes:
>> Here is a patch to add ACTION-IF-FOUND and ACTION-IF-NOT-FOUND to
>> AM_PROG_VALAC.
>>
> I assume you've tried to make this compatible with the behaviour of
> AM_PATH_PYTHON as much as possible, right?
Yes, it was supposed to be.
> Also, your patch lacks NEWS entrie
On 09/11/2012 11:34 AM, Daiki Ueno wrote:
> Hi,
>
Hi Daiki, and sorry for the shameful delay.
> It is good that AM_PROG_VALAC does not abort when valac is not found,
> since most upstream tarballs contain generated C files as well.
>
> However, if MINIMUM-VERSION is given and the version comparis
severity 12516 minor
close 12516
thanks
On 09/26/2012 01:35 AM, Reuben Thomas wrote:
> expending → expanding
>
> Checked in current git HEAD.
>
Thanks, fixed with the patch below.
-8<-8<-8<-8<-8<-8<-8<-8<-8<-8<-
>From ba23bc70ab6296d978a681e01d3c342a
