elisp: --batch implies -q, so remove -q.

2012-07-15 Thread Jack Kelly
Hi automakers, I noticed that the --batch argument to emacs implies -q, so I patched out -q. Patch attached, which passes all lisp tests on my machine. Apply to experimental/elisp-work. -- Jack 0001-elisp-batch-implies-q-remove-q.patch Description: Binary data

Re: [PATCH 3/3] ylwrap: rename header inclusion in generated parsers

2012-07-15 Thread Akim Demaille
Hi Stefano, Le 14 juil. 2012 à 10:07, Stefano Lattarini a écrit : > Oh, and: since you've fixed actual bugs, I think a NEWS entry is > warranted. You can add that with a follow-up patch on the top of > yacc-work (before that is merged to maint). I've pushed this in yacc-work-2. * Long-standing

Re: Refactoring elisp compilation

2012-07-15 Thread Stefano Lattarini
On 07/15/2012 01:17 AM, Jack Kelly wrote: > >>> I want to generate some discussion first. I have the following >>> concerns: >>> >>> 1. I would like to add silent-rules support, >> >> Me too, but since the lack of it wouldn't be a regression, that issue >> can be tackled later. >> >>> but it's not

Re: [PATCH 5/7] elisp: no need to "absolutize" $(srcdir) and $(builddir) ...

2012-07-15 Thread Stefano Lattarini
On 07/15/2012 12:31 AM, Jack Kelly wrote: >> >> .el.elc: >> -## We add $(abs_builddir) and $(abs_srcdir) to load-path, so that any >> -## .el files that $< depends upon can be found (including generated >> -## ones). Prefer files from the build directory to those from the source >> -## directory,