Re: [FYI] {maint} docs: it's not true that DISTCHECK_CONFIGURE_FLAGS is maintainer-reserved

2012-06-16 Thread Stefano Lattarini
On 06/16/2012 10:41 AM, Dave Hart wrote: > On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 7:17 AM, Stefano Lattarini > wrote: >> At least, not anymore since commit 'v1.11-372-g9760039' of 2001-06-10, >> "distcheck: add support for AM_DISTCHECK_CONFIGURE_FLAGS". See also >> automake bug#8784. > > That was in 2011, not

Re: [FYI] {maint} docs: it's not true that DISTCHECK_CONFIGURE_FLAGS is maintainer-reserved

2012-06-16 Thread Dave Hart
On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 7:17 AM, Stefano Lattarini wrote: > At least, not anymore since commit 'v1.11-372-g9760039' of 2001-06-10, > "distcheck: add support for AM_DISTCHECK_CONFIGURE_FLAGS".  See also > automake bug#8784. That was in 2011, not a decade earlier. Cheers, Dave Hart

[FYI] {maint} docs: it's not true that DISTCHECK_CONFIGURE_FLAGS is maintainer-reserved

2012-06-16 Thread Stefano Lattarini
At least, not anymore since commit 'v1.11-372-g9760039' of 2001-06-10, "distcheck: add support for AM_DISTCHECK_CONFIGURE_FLAGS". See also automake bug#8784. * doc/automake.texi (Flag Variables Ordering): Do not report 'DISTCHECK_CONFIGURE_FLAGS' as a "variables that are only useful to the mainta