Re: TAP support in automake

2012-03-31 Thread Stefano Lattarini
On 03/31/2012 10:23 PM, Bob Friesenhahn wrote: > On Sat, 31 Mar 2012, Stefano Lattarini wrote: >>> >> Well, automake being automake, it only depends on portable awk[1] ;-) >> OK, portable "nawk" actually (as found by the autoconf builtin macro >> AC_PROG_AWK), but I don't know of any non-museum mac

Re: [FYI] {master} cosmetics: fix repeated line in comment

2012-03-31 Thread Peter Rosin
On 2012-03-31 22:14, Stefano Lattarini wrote: > * automake.in: Drop a repeated line in a comment. Issue > introduced in one of the commits that converted from quoting > `like this' to quoting 'like this'. > > Signed-off-by: Stefano Lattarini > --- > automake.in |1 - > 1 files changed, 0 in

Re: TAP support in automake (was: Re: automake 1.11.3 check-TESTS and command line length)

2012-03-31 Thread Bob Friesenhahn
On Sat, 31 Mar 2012, Stefano Lattarini wrote: Well, automake being automake, it only depends on portable awk[1] ;-) OK, portable "nawk" actually (as found by the autoconf builtin macro AC_PROG_AWK), but I don't know of any non-museum machine lacking that. Good. The new feature is already do

[FYI] {master} cosmetics: fix repeated line in comment

2012-03-31 Thread Stefano Lattarini
* automake.in: Drop a repeated line in a comment. Issue introduced in one of the commits that converted from quoting `like this' to quoting 'like this'. Signed-off-by: Stefano Lattarini --- automake.in |1 - 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/automake.in b/automa

[FYI] {master} cosmetics: remove useless import in automake script

2012-03-31 Thread Stefano Lattarini
* automake.in (Automake::Version): This import is not needed; remove it. Signed-off-by: Stefano Lattarini --- automake.in |1 - 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/automake.in b/automake.in index 3e16fd8..5357557 100644 --- a/automake.in +++ b/automake.in @@ -150,7

Re: automake 1.11.3 check-TESTS and command line length

2012-03-31 Thread Tim Landscheidt
Bob Friesenhahn wrote: >> Are you referring to the GraphicsMagick testsuite? If yes, it seems to me >> that it could benefit greatly from the use of TAP once automake 1.12 is out; >> for example, all the 314 'tests/rwfile*.sh' tests could be rewritten as one >> single TAP test (and similarly for

TAP support in automake (was: Re: automake 1.11.3 check-TESTS and command line length)

2012-03-31 Thread Stefano Lattarini
Hi Bob. On 03/31/2012 07:15 PM, Bob Friesenhahn wrote: > On Wed, 22 Feb 2012, Stefano Lattarini wrote: >>> >> Are you referring to the GraphicsMagick testsuite? If yes, it seems to me >> that it could benefit greatly from the use of TAP once automake 1.12 is out; >> for example, all the 314 'test

Re: automake 1.11.3 check-TESTS and command line length

2012-03-31 Thread Bob Friesenhahn
On Wed, 22 Feb 2012, Stefano Lattarini wrote: Are you referring to the GraphicsMagick testsuite? If yes, it seems to me that it could benefit greatly from the use of TAP once automake 1.12 is out; for example, all the 314 'tests/rwfile*.sh' tests could be rewritten as one single TAP test (and

Re: automake 1.11.3 check-TESTS and command line length

2012-03-31 Thread Bob Friesenhahn
On Wed, 22 Feb 2012, Stefano Lattarini wrote: Hi Bob, sorry for the delay. On 02/19/2012 07:55 PM, Bob Friesenhahn wrote: I am again bit by automake not being able run the test suite on systems with bounded command line length. Up to automake 1.11.2 I was able to apply a patch by Ralf Wildenh