* lib/Automake/Getopt.pm: Require perl 5.6.0, not 5.6.2: the former
is enough. See also commit 'v1.11-2054-g7df05a0' on master (dated
04-03-2012).
---
lib/Automake/Getopt.pm |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/lib/Automake/Getopt.pm b/lib/Automake/Getopt.pm
i
On 03/07/2012 09:16 PM, Peter Rosin wrote:
> Stefano Lattarini skrev 2012-03-07 20:55:
>> On 03/07/2012 08:32 PM, Peter Rosin wrote:
>>
>>> currently needs to be made on the non-obvious msvc branch instead
>>> of on the more natural maint branch.
>>>
>> "instead of on" sounds a little forced to me
Stefano Lattarini skrev 2012-03-07 20:55:
> On 03/07/2012 08:32 PM, Peter Rosin wrote:
>> Stefano Lattarini skrev 2012-03-07 16:39:
*snip*
>>> Could you try to write such a commit message, and post if for review before
>>> pushing? Otherwise, I'll try to do so myself -- but I strongly believe that
On 03/07/2012 08:32 PM, Peter Rosin wrote:
> Stefano Lattarini skrev 2012-03-07 16:39:
>> On 03/07/2012 04:00 PM, Peter Rosin wrote:
>>> Peter Rosin skrev 2012-03-07 14:08:
Do you think it would be at all possible to start with a msvc and maint
that is freshly merged into both master and
Peter Rosin skrev 2012-03-07 20:32:
*snip*
> All in all, this merge is not going to affect neither the master
s/ not//
> branch nor branch-1.11, since it is followed up with dummy merges
> masking all changes. The merge is made to maintain the sanity of the
> poor developers, who wishes to once ag
Stefano Lattarini skrev 2012-03-07 16:39:
> On 03/07/2012 04:00 PM, Peter Rosin wrote:
>> Peter Rosin skrev 2012-03-07 14:08:
>>> Do you think it would be at all possible to start with a msvc and maint
>>> that is freshly merged into both master and branch-1.11. Then merge msvc
>>> into maint in s
On 03/07/2012 04:00 PM, Peter Rosin wrote:
> Peter Rosin skrev 2012-03-07 14:08:
>> Do you think it would be at all possible to start with a msvc and maint
>> that is freshly merged into both master and branch-1.11. Then merge msvc
>> into maint in such a way that maint resembles branch-1.11, then
Peter Rosin skrev 2012-03-07 14:08:
> Do you think it would be at all possible to start with a msvc and maint
> that is freshly merged into both master and branch-1.11. Then merge msvc
> into maint in such a way that maint resembles branch-1.11, then do dummy
> merges of maint into master and bran
Stefano Lattarini skrev 2012-03-07 08:35:
> On 03/06/2012 10:06 PM, Peter Rosin wrote:
>> Stefano Lattarini skrev 2012-03-06 21:58:
>>> [re-adding the list]
>>>
>>> On 03/06/2012 09:18 PM, Peter Rosin wrote:
>
> You also forgot scriptversion...
>>> True, but see below.
>>>
...whic
The sleeps were there to make generated autotools files strictly
newer than their sources; however, this is not necessary, since
POSIX mandates that make considers files with the same timestamp
of their dependencies to be up-to-date.
* tests/remake9a.test: Remove useless $sleep.
* tests/remake9b.t
10 matches
Mail list logo
