On 12/23/2011 11:17 AM, Stefano Lattarini wrote:
> HI Jim.
>
> On 12/23/2011 11:04 AM, Jim Meyering wrote:
>> Stefano Lattarini wrote:
>>> Any objection to the idea of finally merging the testsuite-work branch back
>>> into master?
>>
>> No objection at all. Please do.
>>
> I'll still wait a coup
On 12/26/2011 07:09 PM, Paul Eggert wrote:
> On 12/26/11 09:42, Stefano Lattarini wrote:
>> And here is the follow-up tweaking for the test cases I had
>> promised. I will push in a couple of days if there is no objection.
>
> Thanks, that looks good to me; please push it as soon as you like.
>
D
tags 8071 patch
close 8071
thanks
Hi Reuben, sorry for the ludicrous delay.
On 02/18/2011 12:04 AM, Reuben Thomas wrote:
> This is actually a bug that affects several autotools packages,
> excluding autoconf, for which it's already fixed: the invocation node
> is added to the info dir as "automak
On 12/26/11 09:42, Stefano Lattarini wrote:
> And here is the follow-up tweaking for the test cases I had
> promised. I will push in a couple of days if there is no objection.
Thanks, that looks good to me; please push it as soon as you like.
tags 10237 + patch
tags 9928 + patch
thanks
On 12/25/2011 07:04 PM, Paul Eggert wrote:
> On 12/23/11 00:50, Stefano Lattarini wrote:
>> could you apply the patch *not to maint nor to master*, but to a *new*
>> branch (say `silent-fixes' or `silent-portability') based off of maint,
>> and push that
