Re: {Automake-NG} mailing lists are cheap

On Friday 16 December 2011, Jim Meyering wrote: > Stefano Lattarini wrote: > > On Friday 16 December 2011, Dave Hart wrote: > >> Please consider creating mailing lists for Automake-NG work. It is > >> different enough from Automake to warrant another list, particularly > >> for those of us interes

Re: [Platform-testers] Automake 1.11.1b test release

Hi Eric. On Friday 16 December 2011, Eric Blake wrote: > On 12/16/2011 03:26 AM, Stefano Lattarini wrote: > > +++ b/tests/defs.in > > @@ -103,6 +103,17 @@ test -z "$AUTORECONF" && AUTORECONF="@am_AUTORECONF@" > > test -z "$AUTOHEADER" && AUTOHEADER="@am_AUTOHEADER@" > > test -z "$AUTOUPDATE" &&

Re: [Platform-testers] Automake 1.11.1b test release

On 12/16/2011 03:26 AM, Stefano Lattarini wrote: > +++ b/tests/defs.in > @@ -103,6 +103,17 @@ test -z "$AUTORECONF" && AUTORECONF="@am_AUTORECONF@" > test -z "$AUTOHEADER" && AUTOHEADER="@am_AUTOHEADER@" > test -z "$AUTOUPDATE" && AUTOUPDATE="@am_AUTOUPDATE@" > test -z "$MISSING" && MISSING=`pwd

Re: {Automake-NG} mailing lists are cheap

Stefano Lattarini wrote: > On Friday 16 December 2011, Dave Hart wrote: >> Please consider creating mailing lists for Automake-NG work. It is >> different enough from Automake to warrant another list, particularly >> for those of us interested solely in Automake developments. >> >> Thanks, >> Dave

Re: [Platform-testers] Automake 1.11.1b test release

Reference: [Adding automake-patches and bug-automake] [Answers will drop the automake list] -*-*- Hi Bruno; thanks for the testing and the quick feedback. On Friday 16 December 2011, Bruno Haible wrote: > > The pre-release auto

Re: {Automake-NG} mailing lists are cheap

Hi Dave. On Friday 16 December 2011, Dave Hart wrote: > Please consider creating mailing lists for Automake-NG work. It is > different enough from Automake to warrant another list, particularly > for those of us interested solely in Automake developments. > > Thanks, > Dave Hart > Good points.