Re: [PATCH] tests: avoid false positive due to change in --help formatting

On Friday 04 November 2011, Stefano Lattarini wrote: > > [SNIP] > > Attached is a patch in this spirit; I'll push in a few hours if there is > no objection. > Oops, wrong patch. Attached is the correct patch. Sorry for the noise, Stefano From 8355b2b59221c58b33d686a0a2b4f22a19a3c330 Mon Sep 17

Re: [PATCH] tests: avoid false positive due to change in --help formatting

Hi Jim, thanks for the report On Friday 04 November 2011, Jim Meyering wrote: > I updated to the latest from master and noticed that "make check" > showed a single failing test. Here's the fix: > > [Because --help now looks like this: > > --disable-maintainer-mode >

[FYI] {msvc} warnings: fix buglets for portability warnings

* lib/Automake/ChannelDefs.pm (switch_warning): Ensure the correct implications and inter-dependencies between warnings in the categories `portability', `extra-portability' and `recursive-portability' are respected. Also add detailed explicative comments, and references to the relevant tests. * te

[FYI] {msvc} tests: extend tests on 'extra-portability' warning category

* tests/extra-portability.test: Redefine `$AUTOMAKE' to ensure we have complete control over the automake options. Extend by using also a setup where no `portability' warning is present (only an `extra-portability' warning is). Other minor extensions. Remove some redundant, verbose comments abou

merging msvc in branch-1.11 (was: Re: [RFC] Releasing automake 1.11.2)

Reference: [Adding automake-patches] On Tuesday 01 November 2011, Stefano Lattarini wrote: > Hi Peter. > > On Sunday 30 October 2011, Peter Rosin wrote: > > > > [SNIP] > > > > Sorry for the confusion, but the latest commit fro

[PATCH] tests: avoid false positive due to change in --help formatting

I updated to the latest from master and noticed that "make check" showed a single failing test. Here's the fix: [Because --help now looks like this: --disable-maintainer-mode disable make rules and dependencies not useful (and Presumably, before the description was o