* doc/automake.texi (aclocal Options): Remove mention of
deprecated `--acdir' option.
---
ChangeLog |6 ++
doc/automake.texi |5 -
2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/ChangeLog b/ChangeLog
index 0fdb295..d89b280 100644
--- a/ChangeLog
+++ b/Change
---
ChangeLog |4
NEWS | 19 ---
2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/ChangeLog b/ChangeLog
index 01388cc..0fdb295 100644
--- a/ChangeLog
+++ b/ChangeLog
@@ -1,5 +1,9 @@
2011-09-20 Stefano Lattarini
+ * NEWS: Cleanup after bot
On Tuesday 20 September 2011, Stefano Lattarini wrote:
> We definitely want to clean this all up in 1.12 -- code, documentation and
> testsuite as well.
>
For the moment, I'd like to push this follow-up patch to maint as well,
to "smooth out" the transition a bit. I will push this patch and the
On Tuesday 20 September 2011, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 09/20/2011 02:09 PM, Stefano Lattarini wrote:
> >> Yeah, I think the problem is that in the normal search path (from
> >> `aclocal -I /foo -I /bar'):
> >>
> >> 1. `/foo'
> >>
> >> 2. `/bar'
> >>
> >> 3. ACDIR-APIVERSION
> >>
> >>
On 09/20/2011 02:09 PM, Stefano Lattarini wrote:
Yeah, I think the problem is that in the normal search path (from
`aclocal -I /foo -I /bar'):
1. `/foo'
2. `/bar'
3. ACDIR-APIVERSION
4. ACDIR
The directories from dirlist and ACLOCAL_PATH should go after (3),
rather than after
On Tuesday 20 September 2011, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 09/20/2011 12:51 PM, Stefano Lattarini wrote:
> > > Yes (and that's on purpose: ACLOCAL_PATH is typically used by a user
> > > which has newer versions of libraries installed, so they need their
> > > directories to override everything).
>
On 09/20/2011 12:51 PM, Stefano Lattarini wrote:
> Yes (and that's on purpose: ACLOCAL_PATH is typically used by a user
> which has newer versions of libraries installed, so they need their
> directories to override everything).
Yes, this might be desirable. But then, for consistency sake, s
On Monday 19 September 2011, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 18:39, Stefano Lattarini
> wrote:
> >> Just to be sure, you are not including
> >> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/automake-patches/2010-11/msg00091.html
> >> are you?
> >>
> > No, not yet at least.
> >
> > Because, if I
