Hi Peter.
On Monday 12 September 2011, Peter Rosin wrote:
> Den 2011-09-12 11:16 skrev Stefano Lattarini:
> > The python-work branch contains very minimal refactorings, improvements
> > and testsuite enhancements for the Automake python support. IMHO it could
> > safely merged back into maint. H
* tests/test-log.test (fail.test): Remove extra `echo' command,
probably due to a past copy&paste blunder.
---
ChangeLog |6 ++
tests/test-log.test |1 -
2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/ChangeLog b/ChangeLog
index 9c19124..9b98bfd 100644
--- a/C
Den 2011-09-12 11:16 skrev Stefano Lattarini:
> The python-work branch contains very minimal refactorings, improvements
> and testsuite enhancements for the Automake python support. IMHO it could
> safely merged back into maint. Here is the commits that would be merged:
>
> b46debf python: run
Hello automakers.
The java-work branch contains mostly testsuite enahcements, but also a
couple of bug fixes. There is no point in merging such bug fixes in
master only though, since we plan to basically rewrite the whole
Automake's Java support in the next release, with heavy paradigm and
API ch
The python-work branch contains very minimal refactorings, improvements
and testsuite enhancements for the Automake python support. IMHO it could
safely merged back into maint. Here is the commits that would be merged:
b46debf python: run the 'py-compile' script with $(SHELL)
dd8b570 py-compil
On Monday 12 September 2011, Dave Hart wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 10, 2011 at 17:19, Stefano Lattarini
> wrote:
> > +# sometimes contain TAP lines that would confuse `prove'. This
> > +# This has already happened in practice, especially for the tests
> > +# checking TAP support in automake-
