Re: documentation about AM_CPPFLAGS and VPATH builds

2011-08-01 Thread Bruno Haible
Hi Stefano, > > +When a file to be included is generated during the build and not part > > +of a distribution tarball, its location is under @code{$(builddir)}, > > +not under @code{$(srcdir)}. This matters for builds outside the source > > +tree (@pxref{VPATH Builds}). Therefore we recommend to

[FYI] {GSoC} testsuite: separate the only failing check of an xfailing test

2011-08-01 Thread Stefano Lattarini
* tests/plan-bad-prog.test: Move the only failing check of this test (i.e., the one about the total number of "ERROR" outcomes) into ... * tests/plan-bad-prog2.test: ... this new test. * tests/Makefile.am (XFAIL_TESTS): Remove `plan-bad-prog.test', add `plan-bad-prog2.test'. (tap_other_tests): Add

[FYI] {GSoC} testsuite: fix spurious errors in an xfailing test on TAP support

2011-08-01 Thread Stefano Lattarini
* tests/plan-bad-prog.test: Fix typo in the name of the test being made unreadable. Correct the wording of the potential skip message, and simplify the condition under which the test is to be skipped. Escape literal dots in grep regexps. --- ChangeLog |8 tests/tap-bad

[FYI] {GSoC} testsuite: better granularity in a couple of tests on TAP support

2011-08-01 Thread Stefano Lattarini
* tests/tap-summary-aux.sh: New auxiliary script, filled with code moved out from ... * tests/tap-summary.test: ... this test, from which the checks on colored testsuite have further been moved into ... * tests/tap-summary-color.test: ... this new test, which in turn * tests/Makefile.am (tap_other_

Re: documentation about AM_CPPFLAGS and VPATH builds

2011-08-01 Thread Stefano Lattarini
On Sunday 31 July 2011, Bruno Haible wrote: > Hi, > Hi Bruno. Thanks for the patch, and sorry for the delay. > Paul and Jim approved the idea to give a recommendation about how to set up > the -I options in AM_CPPFLAGS for dealing with VPATH builds. > > Originally I wanted to document this in th