Re: [PATCH] {master} coverage: new test on parallel-tests TESTS runtime overriding

Hi Ralf, thanks for the lightspeed review. On Thursday 30 June 2011, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > * Stefano Lattarini wrote on Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 04:40:51PM CEST: > > I'd like to add this new test case to master. OK? > > Sure, note typo below. > > This could actually find bugs in older makes, but

Re: bug#8969: improve synchronization between examples in the manual and test cases

On Friday 01 July 2011, Stefano Lattarini wrote: > Severity: wishlist > thanks > > Reference: > > > On Tuesday 28 June 2011, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > > * Stefano Lattarini wrote on Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 08:24:13AM CEST: >

improve synchronization between examples in the manual and test cases

Severity: wishlist thanks Reference: On Tuesday 28 June 2011, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > * Stefano Lattarini wrote on Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 08:24:13AM CEST: > > On Monday 27 June 2011, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > > > Sure. Wel

Re: [FYI] {master} docs: fix unportable example of AM_TESTS_ENVIRONMENT usage

On Thursday 30 June 2011, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > * Stefano Lattarini wrote on Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 10:45:02PM CEST: > > On Thursday 30 June 2011, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > > > I'm fairly sure that's only with historic shells and not an > > > issue in practice any more (Sven Mascheck's pages will h

Re: [MERGE REQUEST] merge patches for AM_TESTSUITE_ENVIRONMENT into maint

On Thursday 30 June 2011, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > * Ralf Wildenhues wrote on Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 10:52:16PM CEST: > > * Stefano Lattarini wrote on Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 05:12:38PM CEST: > > > I think that the patches introducing support for AM_TESTSUITE_ENVIRONMENT > > > should be merged into main

Re: [FYI] {master} docs: fix unportable example of AM_TESTS_ENVIRONMENT usage

* Stefano Lattarini wrote on Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 10:45:02PM CEST: > On Thursday 30 June 2011, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > > I'm fairly sure that's only with historic shells and not an > > issue in practice any more (Sven Mascheck's pages will have the details > > for the curious). > Anyway, I do thi

Re: [FYI] {master} docs: fix unportable example of AM_TESTS_ENVIRONMENT usage

On Thursday 30 June 2011, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > Hi Stefano, > > * Stefano Lattarini wrote on Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 10:56:31PM CEST: > > On Thursday 23 June 2011, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > > > > -AM_TESTS_ENVIRONMENT = exec 9>&2; warn_fileno=9; export warn_fileno; > > > > > > This example served

Re: [MERGE REQUEST] merge patches for AM_TESTSUITE_ENVIRONMENT into maint

* Ralf Wildenhues wrote on Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 10:52:16PM CEST: > * Stefano Lattarini wrote on Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 05:12:38PM CEST: > > I think that the patches introducing support for AM_TESTSUITE_ENVIRONMENT > > should be merged into maint, as they'd make a nice addition for 1.11.2. > > I've ve

Re: [PATCH] parallel-tests: new recognized test result 'ERROR'

* Stefano Lattarini wrote on Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 04:58:21PM CEST: > I've applied the attached patch to the 'GSoC/experimental/test-results-work' > branch Note that this is not an FYI, since that branch is temporary, and can > thus be amended and modified. Reviews are welcome! Just a couple of q

Re: [MERGE REQUEST] merge patches for AM_TESTSUITE_ENVIRONMENT into maint

* Stefano Lattarini wrote on Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 05:12:38PM CEST: > I think that the patches introducing support for AM_TESTSUITE_ENVIRONMENT > should be merged into maint, as they'd make a nice addition for 1.11.2. > I've verified that almost all these patches are based off of maint, and > the fe

Re: [FYI] {master} docs: fix unportable example of AM_TESTS_ENVIRONMENT usage

Hi Stefano, * Stefano Lattarini wrote on Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 10:56:31PM CEST: > On Thursday 23 June 2011, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > > > -AM_TESTS_ENVIRONMENT = exec 9>&2; warn_fileno=9; export warn_fileno; > > > > This example served two purposes: use of AM_TESTS_ENVIRONMENT, and > > showing how

Re: [PATCH] {master} coverage: new test on parallel-tests TESTS runtime overriding

* Stefano Lattarini wrote on Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 04:40:51PM CEST: > I'd like to add this new test case to master. OK? Sure, note typo below. This could actually find bugs in older makes, but hey, we'd want to know about them. Thanks, Ralf > Subject: [PATCH] coverage: new test on parallel-test

[MERGE REQUEST] merge patches for AM_TESTSUITE_ENVIRONMENT into maint

Hello automakers. I think that the patches introducing support for AM_TESTSUITE_ENVIRONMENT should be merged into maint, as they'd make a nice addition for 1.11.2. I've verified that almost all these patches are based off of maint, and the few that aren't (e.g., `v1.11-867-g1e005df') are just test

[FYI] {maint} cosmetics: fix typos in recent ChangeLog entries

--- ChangeLog |8 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/ChangeLog b/ChangeLog index af1c66d..f1e10c2 100644 --- a/ChangeLog +++ b/ChangeLog @@ -1,11 +1,11 @@ -2011-06-23 Stefano Lattarini +2011-06-23 Stefano Lattarini docs: avoid a footnote, s

[PATCH] parallel-tests: new recognized test result 'ERROR'

I've applied the attached patch to the 'GSoC/experimental/test-results-work' branch Note that this is not an FYI, since that branch is temporary, and can thus be amended and modified. Reviews are welcome! Thanks, Stefano From 2df72384ab57d165c7e1da0f88e513171a0035e8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 Me

[FYI] New public temporary branch, about improved handling and parsing of test results

On Wednesday 29 June 2011, Stefano Lattarini wrote: > Reference: > > > The new code for parsing the testsuite-generated `.log' files, > as introduced in commit `v1.11-872-gc96b881', considers each > `:test-result:' field a

[PATCH] {master} coverage: new test on parallel-tests TESTS runtime overriding

I'd like to add this new test case to master. OK? I'll push in 72 hours if there is no review by then. Regards, Stefano From b1531a90bf07d3343dda5111f4789e3b6066e480 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 Message-Id: From: Stefano Lattarini Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2011 16:37:19 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] coverage: n