On Thursday 19 May 2011, Stefano Lattarini wrote:
> On Wednesday 18 May 2011, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> > Can you use 'native' instead of 'non-cross' and go ahead with
> > that? That would fit the lingo better.
> >
> Of course. I never liked 'non-cross' very much, but I failed to
> come up with a
* tests/defs.in (non-cross): Rename requirement ...
(native): ... to this, which is clearer and fits the
existing lingo better.
Suggestion by Ralf Wildenhues.
---
ChangeLog |8
tests/defs.in |2 +-
2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/ChangeLog b/Cha
On Wednesday 18 May 2011, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> Hi Stefano,
>
> * Stefano Lattarini wrote on Wed, May 18, 2011 at 06:19:55PM CEST:
> > I will wait until tomorrow for a review, before pushing.
>
> I really don't have the time to do a close review right now,
>
Bummer :-(
> but can you use 'nati
