Re: [PATCH] {master} coverage: add tests on remake rules in more complex situations (was: Re: not breaking "make" after m4 macros and source files changed)

Hi Stefano, > Done in the attached patch. Great! I'm glad that you could use my input, although I mostly don't know about the usual habits and idioms for automake unit tests. Comments: - In remake-renamed-m4-macro.test you use "$MAKE test" once and then "$MAKE check" (twice). Is this intentio

Fix makedepend depmode to cope with VPATH builds

Ugh, a looong-standing depmode=makedepend bug that silently breaks rebuilds in VPATH trees. It has now hit me in the wild. :-( Anyway, this is for maint, and I'd appreciate review, but will otherwise push soonish. (I'll probably have to defer any reviewing until the weekend ...) Thanks, Ralf

Re: bug#8234: check_JAVA built during make

On Wednesday 06 April 2011, Petteri Räty wrote: > On 04/06/2011 07:52 PM, Stefano Lattarini wrote: > > The attached patch should fix the bug. The exposing testcase passes > > with the modification to automake.in installed, and fails without. > > > > OK for maint? I'll push in 72 hours if there i

Re: bug#8234: check_JAVA built during make

tags 8234 patch thanks [adding automake-patches] Hello Petteri. Thanks for the report, and sorry for the delay. On Saturday 12 March 2011, Petteri Räty wrote: > http://sources.redhat.com/automake/automake.html > > "The special prefix ‘check_’ indicates that the objects in question > should not

[PATCH] {master} coverage: add tests on remake rules in more complex situations (was: Re: not breaking "make" after m4 macros and source files changed)

[adding automake-patches] [IMHO further answers can drop automake and bug-gnulib] Reference: On Sunday 03 April 2011, Bruno Haible wrote: > Hi Ralf, Stefano, > > > I'll make amend by writing the new testcases, if you can wait so