Re: bug#7944: Should AM_PATH_PYTHON call AC_ARG_VAR?

2011-01-31 Thread Jack Kelly
On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 7:31 AM, Stefano Lattarini wrote: > On Monday 31 January 2011, Jack Kelly wrote: >> I've noticed that if you put AM_PATH_PYTHON in configure.ac, it >> doesn't add an entry for PYTHON in ./configure --help. Is PYTHON meant >> to be a user's variable? > According to the commen

Re: bug#7944: Should AM_PATH_PYTHON call AC_ARG_VAR?

2011-01-31 Thread Stefano Lattarini
On Monday 31 January 2011, Jack Kelly wrote: > On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 7:31 AM, Stefano Lattarini > wrote: > > On Monday 31 January 2011, Jack Kelly wrote: > >> I've noticed that if you put AM_PATH_PYTHON in configure.ac, it > >> doesn't add an entry for PYTHON in ./configure --help. Is PYTHON mean

Re: bug#7944: Should AM_PATH_PYTHON call AC_ARG_VAR?

2011-01-31 Thread Stefano Lattarini
On Monday 31 January 2011, Jack Kelly wrote: > Hi automakers, > > I've noticed that if you put AM_PATH_PYTHON in configure.ac, it > doesn't add an entry for PYTHON in ./configure --help. Is PYTHON meant > to be a user's variable? > According to the comments in `m4/python.m4' and to the tests `pyt

Re: [PATCH] {yacc-work} tests: don't define YACC and LEX in the Makefiles

2011-01-31 Thread Stefano Lattarini
On Sunday 30 January 2011, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > * Stefano Lattarini wrote on Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 07:50:05PM CET: > > We don't want YACC and LEX defined as make variables, otherwise > > the values determined at configure time will override those from > > the environment, even in the make-spawne