* Ian Lance Taylor wrote on Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 06:29:39PM CET:
> Ralf Wildenhues writes:
>
> > Am I correct in assuming that it is hopeless to assume GCC will work
> > when either values are relative?
>
> Actually, as far as I know, GCC is likely to work with a relative
> srcdir. The problem a
On Friday 14 January 2011, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> > OK to apply the patch in a new commit between [PATCH 2/9] and [PATCH 3/9]?
>
> Well yes, but why omit the documentation bits that I asked for?
> (efficient communication, and all that)
>
Because I forgot about them! :-(
Thanks for the reminde
* Stefano Lattarini wrote on Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 01:38:47PM CET:
> And below is the dif for the sanity check I'd like to squash in.
>
> OK?
Yep, with nits addressed.
Thanks!
Ralf
> @@ -345,14 +352,25 @@ sub _process_option_list (\%@)
>return 0;
> }
>
> +# Note the sanity checks: these f
On Friday 14 January 2011, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> * Stefano Lattarini wrote on Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 10:27:48PM CET:
> > On Thursday 13 January 2011, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> > > * Stefano Lattarini wrote on Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 09:11:41PM CET:
> > > > On Wednesday 12 January 2011, Ralf Wildenhues
And below is the dif for the sanity check I'd like to squash in.
OK?
Regards,
Stefano
-*-*-
diff --git a/ChangeLog b/ChangeLog
index 78452d8..82ef6a1 100644
--- a/ChangeLog
+++ b/ChangeLog
@@ -8,6 +8,10 @@
This finally fixes Automake bug#7669 a.k.a. PR/547.
* automake.in (hand
