Re: [PATCH] {master} Extend, fix and improve tests on Lex and Yacc support.

2010-12-16 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
* Stefano Lattarini wrote on Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 10:10:29PM CET: > On Thursday 16 December 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > > > > BTW, notice that I'm planning to further extend the Lex/Yacc tests > > > and make them more "semantic", but that should be better done in a > > > follow-up patch IMVHO.

Re: [PATCH] Improvements and extend tests on canonicalization.

2010-12-16 Thread Stefano Lattarini
On Thursday 16 December 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > * Stefano Lattarini wrote on Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 08:16:25PM CET: > > On Thursday 16 December 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > > > --- a/tests/canon7.test > > > +++ b/tests/canon7.test > > > @@ -43,7 +43,7 @@ dummy_dynamic_SOURCES = $(dummy_stati

Re: [PATCH] {master} Extend, fix and improve tests on Lex and Yacc support.

2010-12-16 Thread Stefano Lattarini
On Thursday 16 December 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > * Stefano Lattarini wrote on Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 07:54:05PM CET: > > OK to apply to a temporary branch off of maint, and merge to master? > > The patch is ok with nits addressed. > I've addressed almost all of them, but I have a doubt about o

Re: [PATCH] {master} Extend, fix and improve tests on Lex and Yacc support.

2010-12-16 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
* Stefano Lattarini wrote on Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 07:54:05PM CET: > OK to apply to a temporary branch off of maint, and merge to master? The patch is ok with nits addressed. > BTW, notice that I'm planning to further extend the Lex/Yacc tests > and make them more "semantic", but that should be be

Re: [PATCH] Improvements and extend tests on canonicalization.

2010-12-16 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
* Stefano Lattarini wrote on Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 08:16:25PM CET: > On Thursday 16 December 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > > --- a/tests/canon7.test > > +++ b/tests/canon7.test > > @@ -43,7 +43,7 @@ dummy_dynamic_SOURCES = $(dummy_static_SOURCES) > > dummy_static_LDADD = $(noinst_LIBRARIES) > > d

Re: [PATCH] Improvements and extend tests on canonicalization.

2010-12-16 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
* Stefano Lattarini wrote on Sat, Dec 11, 2010 at 06:41:46PM CET: > Ping on this? Reference: > > > The updated patch is attached. I will push it in 72 hours (by tuesday > evening) unless there are objections. > --- /dev/

Re: [PATCH] Improvements and extend tests on canonicalization.

2010-12-16 Thread Stefano Lattarini
On Thursday 16 December 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > > --- /dev/null > > +++ b/tests/canon7.test > > @@ -0,0 +1,93 @@ > > > +# Stress test on canonicalization. > [...] > > +cat > Makefile.am << 'END' > > +noinst_PROGRAMS = dummy_static dummy_dynamic ,foo-bar > > +noinst_LIBRARIES = libb.az+baz.a

Avoid false positive in sc_tests_plain_make maintainer-check.

2010-12-16 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
I'm seeing this in master now: ../automake/tests/remake11.test:makefiles_am_list=`find . -name Makefile.am | LC_ALL=C sort` ../automake/tests/remake11.test:makefiles_list=`echo "$makefiles_am_list" | sed 's/\.am$//'` Do not run "make" in the above tests. Use "$MAKE" instead. Makefile:1090: reci

Re: bug#7654: docs: is LTLIBRARIES missing from the list of primaries in the automake manual?

2010-12-16 Thread Stefano Lattarini
On Thursday 16 December 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > * Stefano Lattarini wrote on Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 06:40:37PM CET: > > In section "3.3 The Uniform Naming Scheme" I read: > > > > ``The current primary names are ‘PROGRAMS’, ‘LIBRARIES’, ‘LISP’, > >‘PYTHON’, ‘JAVA’, ‘SCRIPTS’, ‘DATA’, ‘HEA

Re: [PATCH] Test `$(var:suf=rpl)' expansion in special automake variables.

2010-12-16 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
* Stefano Lattarini wrote on Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 10:48:08PM CET: > > Test `$(var:suf=rpl)' expansion in special automake variables. > > > > * tests/posixsubst-data.test: New test. > > * tests/posixsubst-extradist.test: Likewise. > > * tests/posixsubst-ldadd.test: Likewise. > > * tests/posixsubst-

[PATCH] {master} Improve and extend tests `suffix*.test'.

2010-12-16 Thread Stefano Lattarini
Hello automakers. Here it is one of the last (5 or 6) testsuite-only patches I have in my repository. Tested successfully: - Debian GNU/Linux, system GNU make (3.81) & bash (4.1), gcc 4.4.4, libtool 2.2.6b, autoconf 2.68. - Debian GNU/Linux, GNU make 3.79, dash (0.5.5.1), gcc 4.0.1,

[FYI] patch pushed (was: Re: [PATCH] Improvements and extend tests on canonicalization.)

2010-12-16 Thread Stefano Lattarini
Pushed to master now. Regards, Stefano

[FYI] patch pushed (was: [PATCH] Improve tests on generated portions of configure help screen.)

2010-12-16 Thread Stefano Lattarini
I've now pushed the patch to maint, and merged maint into master. Regards, Stefano

[FYI] patch pushed (was: [PATCH] More uses of AS_HELP_STRING in automake macros.)

2010-12-16 Thread Stefano Lattarini
I've rabased this patch over latest master (with maint already merged, and thus with the patch "Improve tests on generated portions of configure help screen." already merged), and pushed. Regards, Stefano

Re: [PATCH] Extend checks on remake rules.

2010-12-16 Thread Stefano Lattarini
On Thursday 16 December 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > * Stefano Lattarini wrote on Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 01:27:10AM CET: > > On Wednesday 15 December 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > [ magic strings ] > > > Why all the variation in these? That makes the tests harder to read. > > > > > I'd rather not

[FYI] patch pushed (was: Re: [PATCH 2/2] Extended tests on AC_CONFIG_AUX_DIR).

2010-12-16 Thread Stefano Lattarini
I've now pushed the patch to master. Regards, Stefano