Re: [SIMPLE PATCH] {master} Be more consistent in copyright notices.

* Stefano Lattarini wrote on Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 12:22:57AM CET: > While modifying the test script `suffix13.test' recently, I noticed > that it uses an obsolete form of copyright notice: > > # This file is part of GNU Automake. > # > # GNU Automake is free software; you can redistribute it an

Re: [PATCH] {maint} Make tests `colon*.test' more "semantic".

Rebased on latest maint, since the last work there has caused the patch not to apply cleanly anymore. Regards, Stefano From 212fcc974238d908eb66ea4ddefb0df81cf02dc4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Stefano Lattarini Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2010 00:40:42 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] Make tests `colon*.test'

[SIMPLE PATCH] {master} Be more consistent in copyright notices.

Hello automakers. While modifying the test script `suffix13.test' recently, I noticed that it uses an obsolete form of copyright notice: # This file is part of GNU Automake. # # GNU Automake is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify # it under the terms of the GNU General Public

Re: Testsuite failures on Solaris 2.10 on SPARC

On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 21:28 UTC, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > Hi Dave, > > * Dave Hart wrote on Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 10:22:32PM CET: >> The Sun NFS client intentionally defers deleting files, renaming them >> to .nfs for some period of time that is not brief enough for "make >> distcheck" to suc

Re: Testsuite failures on IRIX 6.5 (was: testsuite results from master)

In the meantime, I've prepared a patch to fix the VPATH-related spurious failures in parallel-tests8.test and suffix13.test. Ralf, does it work for you? Regards, Stefano From 87e825fb00f90939b58cc9dd4eddc4a2cb9d5d0a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Stefano Lattarini Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2010 22:28:2

Re: Testsuite failures on Solaris 2.10 on SPARC

Hi Dave, * Dave Hart wrote on Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 10:22:32PM CET: > The Sun NFS client intentionally defers deleting files, renaming them > to .nfs for some period of time that is not brief enough for "make > distcheck" to succeed. How long is that period? Can it be changed? As far as I un

Re: Testsuite failures on Solaris 2.10 on SPARC (was: testsuite results from master)

On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 20:45 UTC, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > * Stefano Lattarini wrote on Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 11:05:55PM CET: >>   > >>  checking build system type... sparc-sun-solaris2.10 > >>  All the testsuite failures seem

Re: Testsuite failures on Solaris 2.10 on SPARC (was: testsuite results from master)

* Stefano Lattarini wrote on Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 11:05:55PM CET: > > checking build system type... sparc-sun-solaris2.10 > All the testsuite failures seem spurious, and due to the following > rm error (in the "distclean"

Re: Testsuite failures on AIX 5.3

On Tuesday 16 November 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > * Stefano Lattarini wrote on Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 08:04:49PM CET: > > Ralf, could you try the attached patches when you have time, and see > > if they fix the issues with ansi.test, colon5.test and colon6.test? > > They do. Please apply. > Mer

Re: Testsuite failures on AIX 5.3

* Stefano Lattarini wrote on Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 08:04:49PM CET: > Ralf, could you try the attached patches when you have time, and see > if they fix the issues with ansi.test, colon5.test and colon6.test? They do. Please apply. Thanks! Ralf > From f140b6bce15a1705ec8258e8914e7b605ef15f6f Mon

Re: Shell comments in make rules

On Tuesday 16 November 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > * Stefano Lattarini wrote on Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 08:28:02PM CET: > > On Tuesday 16 November 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > > > * Stefano Lattarini wrote on Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 08:11:11PM CET: > > > > On Tuesday 16 November 2010, Ralf Wildenhue

Re: Shell comments in make rules

* Stefano Lattarini wrote on Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 08:28:02PM CET: > On Tuesday 16 November 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > > * Stefano Lattarini wrote on Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 08:11:11PM CET: > > > On Tuesday 16 November 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > > > > > > > > But even if it doesn't, shouldn't

Re: Shell comments in make rules

On Tuesday 16 November 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > * Stefano Lattarini wrote on Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 08:11:11PM CET: > > On Tuesday 16 November 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > > > > > > But even if it doesn't, shouldn't the comment in question be consired > > > > a shell comment anyway? If that

Re: Shell comments in make rules (was: backcompat5.test: avoid '##'-style comments inside recipe commands)

* Stefano Lattarini wrote on Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 08:11:11PM CET: > On Tuesday 16 November 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > > > > But even if it doesn't, shouldn't the comment in question be consired > > > a shell comment anyway? If that's not the case, well, I'd regard this > > > behaviour as a se

Shell comments in make rules (was: backcompat5.test: avoid '##'-style comments inside recipe commands)

On Tuesday 16 November 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > * Stefano Lattarini wrote on Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 11:57:14PM CET: > > On Monday 15 November 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > > > * Stefano Lattarini wrote on Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 11:00:16PM CET: > > > >

Re: Testsuite failures on AIX 5.3

Ralf, could you try the attached patches when you have time, and see if they fix the issues with ansi.test, colon5.test and colon6.test? Regards, Stefano From f140b6bce15a1705ec8258e8914e7b605ef15f6f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Stefano Lattarini Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2010 19:18:56 +0100 Subject:

backcompat5.test: avoid '##'-style comments inside recipe commands. (was: Testsuite failures on Tru64 OSF 5.1)

* Stefano Lattarini wrote on Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 11:57:14PM CET: > On Monday 15 November 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > > * Stefano Lattarini wrote on Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 11:00:16PM CET: > > > > > > > > > FAIL: backcompat5.

Re: Testsuite failures on Tru64 OSF 5.1

On Tuesday 16 November 2010, Peter Rosin wrote: > Den 2010-11-16 12:15 skrev Stefano Lattarini: > > I committed to msvc, merged into tests-init and merged tests-init into > master. And pushed. > > The rename was handled just fine as you said, but there was one trivial > conflict caused by the c

Re: Testsuite failures on Tru64 OSF 5.1

On Tuesday 16 November 2010, Peter Rosin wrote: > Den 2010-11-15 23:23 skrev Ralf Wildenhues: > > Hi Peter, > > > > * Peter Rosin wrote on Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 09:19:44AM CET: > >> This is based off of master (but I guess it also applies to tests-init) > >> but the backport to the msvc branch is t

Re: Testsuite failures on Tru64 OSF 5.1

Den 2010-11-16 12:15 skrev Stefano Lattarini: > On Tuesday 16 November 2010, Peter Rosin wrote: >> Den 2010-11-15 23:23 skrev Ralf Wildenhues: >>> Hi Peter, >>> >>> * Peter Rosin wrote on Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 09:19:44AM CET: This is based off of master (but I guess it also applies to tests-ini

Re: Testsuite failures on Tru64 OSF 5.1

On Tuesday 16 November 2010, Peter Rosin wrote: > Den 2010-11-15 23:23 skrev Ralf Wildenhues: > > Hi Peter, > > > > * Peter Rosin wrote on Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 09:19:44AM CET: > >> This is based off of master (but I guess it also applies to tests-init) > >> but the backport to the msvc branch is t