Re: [PATCH] compile: implement library search to support MSVC static linking

2010-09-21 Thread Peter Rosin
Den 2010-09-21 19:56 skrev Ralf Wildenhues: > Hi Peter, > > * Peter Rosin wrote on Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 05:11:26PM CEST: >> This is for the msvc branch. This idea was previously discussed here: >> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/libtool-patches/2010-09/msg00044.html > >> Subject: [PATCH] compi

Tests with Heirloom tools (was: [PATCH v2] Overhauled and modularized tests in `instspc.test'.)

2010-09-21 Thread Stefano Lattarini
BRIEF DESCRIPTION Run the instspc tests with Heirloom tools. DETAILS * The environment is mostly clobbered. * The locale is strictly set to "C". * The heirloom make version used contains the bug worked around by Automake commit `v1.11-159-ge7aa360' "Work around a nasty bug (segfault) of

Re: [PATCH] compile: implement library search to support MSVC static linking

2010-09-21 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hi Peter, * Peter Rosin wrote on Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 05:11:26PM CEST: > This is for the msvc branch. This idea was previously discussed here: > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/libtool-patches/2010-09/msg00044.html > Subject: [PATCH] compile: implement library search to support MSVC static >

Re: [PATCH] Add new 'AM_PROG_AR' macro, triggering the 'ar-lib' script.

2010-09-21 Thread Stefano Lattarini
On Tuesday 21 September 2010, Peter Rosin wrote: > Nope, read again. I think I had all the negations lined up > correctly. > > Rephrase: But now you are taking the position that the only way to > have the warning visible is if it shows up with -Wall and trips up > -Wall -Werror. Yes, that was I me

[PATCH] compile: implement library search to support MSVC static linking

2010-09-21 Thread Peter Rosin
Hi! This is for the msvc branch. This idea was previously discussed here: http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/libtool-patches/2010-09/msg00044.html The implementation is simpler than I thought it would be though. Cheers, Peter >From 3fa9c9010f755aa3294bd2d6a31298f01e76d0d3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2

Re: [PATCH] Add new 'AM_PROG_AR' macro, triggering the 'ar-lib' script.

2010-09-21 Thread Peter Rosin
Den 2010-09-21 14:35 skrev Stefano Lattarini: > On Tuesday 21 September 2010, Peter Rosin wrote: >> Den 2010-09-21 12:46 skrev Stefano Lattarini: >>> Now, many projects might not care at all to support this building >>> environment, while still wanting to use `-Wall' to catch common >>> pitfalls; i

Re: [PATCH] {maint} More tests on macro `AM_WITH_REGEX'.

2010-09-21 Thread Stefano Lattarini
And we should squash in the following: -*-*- diff --git a/tests/regex.test b/tests/regex.test index 9b14a54..611ce24 100755 --- a/tests/regex.test +++ b/tests/regex.test @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ #! /bin/sh -# Copyright (C) 2004 Free Software Foundation, Inc. +# Copyright (C) 2004, 2010 Free Software Fou

Re: [PATCH] Add new 'AM_PROG_AR' macro, triggering the 'ar-lib' script.

2010-09-21 Thread Stefano Lattarini
On Tuesday 21 September 2010, Peter Rosin wrote: > Den 2010-09-21 12:46 skrev Stefano Lattarini: > > Now, many projects might not care at all to support this building > > environment, while still wanting to use `-Wall' to catch common > > pitfalls; in this scenario, a warning triggered by `-Wall' a

Re: [PATCH] Add new 'AM_PROG_AR' macro, triggering the 'ar-lib' script.

2010-09-21 Thread Peter Rosin
Den 2010-09-21 12:46 skrev Stefano Lattarini: > Hi Peter. > > On Tuesday 21 September 2010, Peter Rosin wrote: >> Den 2010-09-17 11:58 skrev Stefano Lattarini: >>> Or what about doing somethins similar to what gcc does, and add a >>> new `-Wextra' category whose warnings are *not* enabled by >>> `

Re: [PATCH v2] Overhauled and modularized tests in `instspc.test'.

2010-09-21 Thread Stefano Lattarini
The patch needed the following squash-in to avoid spurious failures due to `errexit' flag (mis)handling by Solaris /bin/sh: diff --git a/tests/instspc-tests.sh b/tests/instspc-tests.sh index 3cb4c71..fa84f3b 100755 --- a/tests/instspc-tests.sh +++ b/tests/instspc-tests.sh @@ -191,8 +191,12 @@

[SIMPLE PATCH] {maint} Add test for `AM_WITH_DMALLOC' macro.

2010-09-21 Thread Stefano Lattarini
The macro `AM_WITH_DMALLOC' is not checked by the testsuite. The attached pach should provide at least a minimal coverage. OK for maint? Regards, Stefano From b202a90ad9832bb4a7da6cb37322cd34716e75b4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Stefano Lattarini Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2010 12:54:25 +0200 Subject

Re: [PATCH] Add new 'AM_PROG_AR' macro, triggering the 'ar-lib' script.

2010-09-21 Thread Stefano Lattarini
Hi Peter. On Tuesday 21 September 2010, Peter Rosin wrote: > Den 2010-09-17 11:58 skrev Stefano Lattarini: > > Or what about doing somethins similar to what gcc does, and add a > > new `-Wextra' category whose warnings are *not* enabled by > > `-Wall', but which, when enabled, still causes `automa

Re: [PATCH] Add new 'AM_PROG_AR' macro, triggering the 'ar-lib' script.

2010-09-21 Thread Peter Rosin
Den 2010-09-17 11:58 skrev Stefano Lattarini: > On Friday 17 September 2010, Peter Rosin wrote: >> Den 2010-09-16 20:03 skrev Ralf Wildenhues: + + if (! $seen_ar) + { +msg ('portability', $where, + "`$onelib': linking libraries requires " + .

Re: [FYI] {maint} Fix broken link in `AM_WITH_DMALLOC' help screen.

2010-09-21 Thread Stefano Lattarini
On Tuesday 21 September 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > Hi Stefano, > > * Stefano Lattarini wrote on Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 11:47:45PM CEST: > > So I pushed the following patch to maint (without merging to > > master or branch-1.11). > > Thanks. Please also bump copyright years and serial number. H