* Peter Rosin wrote on Fri, Aug 06, 2010 at 12:00:53AM CEST:
> Den 2010-08-01 20:06 skrev Ralf Wildenhues:
> >For actual applicability, it is sufficient if you provide a working
> >script, post testsuite results with it in place (you might want to
> > MAKE='make AR=...'
>
> When I do
>
> MAKE='
[Dropping bug-autom...@gnu.org]
Hi Eric. Thanks for the review.
At Friday 06 August 2010, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 08/05/2010 04:44 PM, Stefano Lattarini wrote:
> >> Thanks for the report. A segfault in make is always a bug in
> >> the make implementation. If we can easily find out what makes
>
On 08/05/2010 04:44 PM, Stefano Lattarini wrote:
>> Thanks for the report. A segfault in make is always a bug in the
>> make implementation. If we can easily find out what makes it
>> fail, and can easily and reliably work around it, then let's maybe
>> consider it, but otherwise let's not bother
At Thursday 05 August 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> Hello Stefano,
>
> * Stefano Lattarini wrote on Thu, Aug 05, 2010 at 07:40:15PM CEST:
> > The test `parallel-tests9.test' fails on Solaris 10 when using
> > /usr/xpg4/bin/make as $MAKE, due to a submake invocation
> > returning an exit status `1
Hi Ralf,
Den 2010-08-01 20:06 skrev Ralf Wildenhues:
For actual applicability, it is sufficient if you provide a working
script, post testsuite results with it in place (you might want to
MAKE='make AR=...'
When I do
MAKE='make "AR=/path/to/archive lib"' make "AR=/path/to/archive lib" chec
* Peter Rosin wrote on Thu, Aug 05, 2010 at 11:10:38AM CEST:
> Den 2010-08-04 22:18 skrev Ralf Wildenhues:
> >Now if you insist, then maybe we can just find another compromise name.
> >Please set $me to the name and use that throughout, so at least a change
> >is easily done. ;-)
>
> I'm perfectl
Hello Ralf.
Ping on this? It seems to me that most issues with this patch had
already been solved, so it's probably a pity to let it bitrotting
here...
Regards,
Stefano
Hi Ralf,
and thank you right back for _your_ work on this! :-)
Den 2010-08-04 22:18 skrev Ralf Wildenhues:
thanks for your work on this!
* Peter Rosin wrote on Wed, Aug 04, 2010 at 12:14:28PM CEST:
Den 2010-08-01 20:06 skrev Ralf Wildenhues:
I wonder whether we can and should call it 'archive
Hello Ralf.
Ping on this? It seems to me that most issues with this patch had
already been solved, so it's probably a pity to let it bitrotting
here...
Regards,
Stefano
Hello Ralf.
Ping on this? It seems to me that most issues with this patch series
had already been solved, so it's probably a pity to let it bitrotting
here...
Regards,
Stefano
10 matches
Mail list logo
