Re: New auxiliary archive script

2010-08-04 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
* Eric Blake wrote on Wed, Aug 04, 2010 at 11:04:29PM CEST: > On 08/04/2010 02:18 PM, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > >> # strip leading dash in $action > >> case $action in > >> -*) action="${action#-}" ;; > >> esac > > > > The case statement is unnecessary, you can use just > > action=${action#-} >

Re: New auxiliary archive script

2010-08-04 Thread Eric Blake
On 08/04/2010 02:18 PM, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: >> # strip leading dash in $action >> case $action in >> -*) action="${action#-}" ;; >> esac > > The case statement is unnecessary, you can use just > action=${action#-} Either way, this assumes an XSI shell. Are we guaranteed that this script w

Re: New auxiliary archive script

2010-08-04 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hi Peter, thanks for your work on this! * Peter Rosin wrote on Wed, Aug 04, 2010 at 12:14:28PM CEST: > Den 2010-08-01 20:06 skrev Ralf Wildenhues: > >Yes, in principle: when them bugs are fixed. Would you be willing to > >rewrite the script so it > > > >- has the blurb header similar to 'compile

Re: New auxiliary archive script

2010-08-04 Thread Peter Rosin
Hi Ralf, Den 2010-08-01 20:06 skrev Ralf Wildenhues: * Peter Rosin wrote on Sun, Aug 01, 2010 at 06:54:57PM CEST: The script still needs @-support, in order to make it possible for libtool to avoid falling back to "-r -o" piecewise linking when the command line gets long, so that's a TODO, and