Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
...
> I've committed the patch now, to be merged in branch-1.11 and master,
> with the only additional change to avoid a second sleep in the error
> path.
>
> Cheers, and thanks again, (and sorry for the multi-second delay ;-)
;-)
Thanks!
* Jim Meyering wrote on Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 10:14:19PM CEST:
> Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> > I think we can fix most instances of this wait portably, without looking
> > at subsecond time stamps: let's just try without sleeping first, and
> > only if that fails, try again after sleeping. What do you
